Didn't you both agree to start from where you left off?
Doesn't that mean that any rulings Kamui made was accepted by both of you as void when you started again?
And you're posting on this thread why?
After strenuous arguments it was more work than it was worth to fight at that point, so we continued. Like I said, arguing this into the ground is making this fight horrendously boring for everyone involved I'm sure. So, we continued for a whopping 3 more posts before Mads decided this was taking too long and just wanted Kamui to decide the winner.
Apparently Kamui's decision wasn't in Madara's favor, so he went to dart. Even then Dart said this was either a stalemate, or I win. At least according to his previous post. So, neither judge (Though I NEVER agreed to Dart making judgement all of a sudden instead of Kamui) is actually leaning in Madara's favor as far as I can see, but hey what do I know?
I'm posting because I can.
Also Kamui did make a decision. "My ruling is one of these two options, you two can calm down, call it bygones and continue from Madara's post or just call it a draw/start over. (However if you do choose to start over, be warned that Madara could have another challenger waiting after this and this could cause more problems then solutions)"
And then you posted and continued the match. After Madara said it was decided to continue. Thus you both agreed with Kamui's first option of continuing from Madara's post.
Then after a few posts Kamui comes and gives another decision. "Verdict? I will have to go with my choice of Rusaku as winner of this match, for keeping the battle going in his favor but also keeping the flow of battle ongoing throughout his last post."
"If their is a problem with my verdict, just confer with me about it and I can get a second judge (Dart) to give his second opinion on this challenge. Until then this is my verdict for this match until further notice. (I can be contacted if needed, just ask me for my Skype or twitter)"
Kamui and Madara both mentioned Dart being involved.
Kamui's is up above and Madara said "Disagreeing with the verdict, believing it to be the other way around, Dart's input will be added as a second opinion."
And in the rules: "-A judge may be picked before or during the battle, if the chosen judge makes a ruling that is deemed ridiculous by either party, a new judge may be chosen ONCE by either side. If the matter still can't be settled, it must be brought to the forums for a final decision."
Now it says a new one can be picked by either side and that it it will be brought to the forum for a final decision if still it can't be settled.
Kamui and now Dart both made a decision, but Madara (as he can) is arguing against it and trying to persuade them to his side. Which is what happens in decision making. Judge makes a choice, you show support for your side, they make another choice/final choice and that's it. Kamui gave 2 decisions so far. 1 to continue (which you did) and then 1 in Rusaku's favor.
Now Dart is the new (2nd perception) judge and made a decision. Madara is arguing that decision and once Dart posts after Madara argued his points again then Dart's final choice be stated.
Dart "So...I need explanations before choosing a final decision."
TL;DR
Right now Kamui is in favor of Rusaku.
Dart (chosen and called on by both Kamui and Madara as stated in the rules that another can be called) is ruling in favor of Rusaku again, BUT has NOT made a final decision.
/end TL;DROnce Dart makes his final D the match is over unless he rules in Madara's favor. I assume if it got to that point it'd go to the forums or one of you would just do something else. I unno