Shinobi Legends Forum - Shinobi Legends Game Site

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New members: you need admin approval, please petition *in game* if you made an account. :)

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Court

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Rules/Foundation / Re: Stalemates (Discussion)
« on: December 11, 2015, 04:08:42 AM »
Have stalemates/draws actually happened before?

2
Council / Re: Explicit and Implicit Powers of the Council (Discussion)
« on: December 09, 2015, 05:10:02 AM »
Seems reasonable enough.

3
Rules/Foundation / Re: Discussion: Final Proof Read of Rules-amendments
« on: December 09, 2015, 05:02:20 AM »
This all seems pretty good to me.

4
Rules/Foundation / Re: Methods of *IC* hunting a Jichuuriki (VOTE!)
« on: December 06, 2015, 06:11:49 AM »
I was under the impression most anime films/movies were never canon in regards to the series, unless they changed that.

I vote no. Naruto lost it's ninja way after some time in the second timeskip. I liked how the Akatsuki had networks of information, various subordinates to aid in their searches... they were being effective ninja. I miss that, in a way, where things were stealthy and actually fun.

5
I'm not really one for people hosting/summoning more than one bijuu, or having an alt with a bijuu too, but that's just me, I guess. Give someone else an opportunity, but that might just be a forum/fair mind-set I'm used to.

6
Rules/Foundation / Re: Forum Account [vote]
« on: December 06, 2015, 05:55:56 AM »
Yes.

7
Seems fine to me, but it might depend on the nature of the fight preference (OOC/IC) - OOC seems like it could have a variety of options, as opposed to IC where you fight with everything your character has, if that makes sense.

8
Rules/Foundation / Re: IC Hunt Discussion
« on: December 06, 2015, 05:46:51 AM »
OOC seems better. I didn't seem to mind OOC, still don't, even if my preferences confused everyone to hell and back -- but I did say it was a wip, I think, so, idk.

9
Council / Re: Should Council Members Judge Biju Matches? VOTE
« on: December 04, 2015, 07:23:45 AM »
No. I've provided enough reason already. Leave out any biased opinion.

10
-No for probation in applying for a council position after being stripped. They might be a better council member than being a host, truthfully; and people will vote for the right people, anyway.

11
Council / Re: How Often Should Elections Be Held? VOTE
« on: December 04, 2015, 06:48:11 AM »
6 months. It's a good amount of time for people to do things.

12
Council / Re: Number of Council Members VOTE
« on: December 04, 2015, 06:47:34 AM »
I am in agreement with 5, my reasoning mentioned already.

13
Council / Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« on: December 04, 2015, 06:46:45 AM »
Vote:
-No current hosts or owners of a bijuu.
-No Kage who possesses a village member with a bijuu.
-No potential judges of a bijuu fight (more like the council member can't judge a bijuu fight once nominated)

14
Council / Re: Bijuu Council! (Rules)
« on: December 04, 2015, 02:57:09 AM »
Staff can have the option of trying for council, I don't see the issue with them not being able to be on the council -- as long as they want to be, they can volunteer to be included in the voting process. That means that they ultimately accept the responsibility and agree that they'll be actively participating in the council duties, on-top of their normal staff work.

Current hosts should not be a part of the council, in hopes of only to avoid biased opinions more-so along with people who are calm, approachable and realistic. If a large problem from the get-go was current hosts, then it should be clear and evident that they should stay away from a position that decides on things regarding active hosts -- opinions will be biased. The council should be separated from judges and current hosts. Simple enough.

Also, I like the idea of 5 people. 3 is too small. 5 people would allow for more feedback, variability, and 2 people wouldn't gang up on one person.

I feel preferences should still be incorporated into terms, because that should be a host's home field advantage, considering they earned their beast and should have some say when making the terms for their fight. It should be just enough to benefit the host than the challenger, but should not skew a scenario; prevailing over a host should be a difficult feat to accomplish.

15
Bijuu Arena / Re: Another Kiri Strip; Featuring Eiko!
« on: October 30, 2015, 12:58:49 AM »
Sans me, weren't all the damn Sanbi hosts inactive?? Like, how does this justify anything? I'm pretty sure everyone has been inactive throughout SL at some point, to be honest.

But, well, I think waiting for the rules is a good option, and I did mention that I was thinking of changing my preferences. But you guys are so adamant and impatient.

Haha, would we even come to an agreement? Probably not.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 20 queries.