*shakes his head*
Shakes head? Come on now, let us not belittle each other's position like that.
...so depending on the size and magnitude of one's dream determines if it is illusionary or not?
I am not saying that. Not at all.
Naruto aspires to a leadership position because he has something to prove. There has been no indication that he would then use that position to inflict punishment on those that shunned him.
In times of war, rarely everyone is affected directly. When the loss is felt higher up a social/political food chain ladder, do believe the results will lead to whatever it takes to end such a war & restore "peace".
I am not certain I understand your point here, however, starting a war with the stated intent of killing "hundreds of millions of people" in an attempt to end war permanently is delusional - to me. That is at the extreme end of even a Hobbesian worldview - and since I am much more of a follower of Locke & Rousseau's worldview, it is inconceivable that that position (killing so many to allegedly stop people from being killed) makes sense to anyone.
The chakra receivers allows more than just six fields of vision. As I have stated, Pein is omnipresent to a degree- on where the bodies are located at. (Now it seems there may be a seventh slave- Kakashi!!! X_x)
If Kakashi is a new slave, it would be because the one Pein used to protect him was destroyed.
Usually the accuser must prove their case. For one to call something imaginary that has been been recognized by millions as non-fiction...well, according to your statement- this can easily be one of the "very few situations"...
The majority at one point thought that the God
s ruled from Mount Olympus.
The majority at one point thought that the Earth was flat.
The majority at one point thought that the Earth was the center of the Universe and that every other celestial body revolved around it.
At one point or another, challenging any of the above was viewed as challenging something "that has been recognized by millions as non-fiction".
In other words, a dominant worldview does not equal undisputed fact.