Topic: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy (Read 24491 times)

Kisame · « **Reply #45 on:** February 10, 2010, 10:09:29 PM »

I'll torture one of em till they tell me! Then I'll kill him after I find the gold..!

Fork · « **Reply #46 on:** February 11, 2010, 12:04:59 AM »

That sounds like my parent's honeymoon

Kisame · « **Reply #47 on:** February 11, 2010, 02:45:33 PM »

Wow, sounds like your parents know how to have fun.

SuperSeal · « **Reply #48 on:** February 13, 2010, 02:17:20 AM »

Sounds like you have no clue what fun is.

Kisame · « **Reply #49 on:** February 13, 2010, 05:51:28 PM »

Yare, yare and yare.

hiro · « **Reply #50 on:** April 18, 2011, 01:27:28 AM »

I DEMAND TO KNOW WHY EVERYONE IS VIEWING THIS TOPIC.

Lebis · « **Reply #51 on:** April 18, 2011, 01:31:10 AM »

I started it... Some person was randomly viewing it. Then I viewed it. then I went back to the who's online thingie, and there were like, 3 more people viewing it. >_>

hiro · « **Reply #52 on:** April 18, 2011, 01:31:44 AM »

So that random person was actually the random person who randomly picked this random topic randomly!

Lebis · « **Reply #53 on:** April 18, 2011, 01:33:40 AM »

I C WUT U DID THAR

hiro · « **Reply #54 on:** April 18, 2011, 01:34:35 AM »

It's called being on topic because I have to be on topic or I get banned for being off topic so I have to be on topic.

Lebis · « **Reply #55 on:** April 18, 2011, 01:35:22 AM »

Nobody else was on topic from the start of this topic when it even became a topic in the first place of topics.

hiro · « **Reply #56 on:** April 18, 2011, 01:37:05 AM »

Yes, but that's because the moderation is lax because moderators don't get on much and therefore let the moderation become lax, keeping them from catching the lack of on-topic-itude. But then Neji started getting on my back about cursing and I already have two strikes and I think it's a three-strike system. >_>;;

And 15K+ posts is a large investment of my time.

Lebis · « **Reply #57 on:** April 18, 2011, 01:38:37 AM »

You better find a way to get rid of some of those strikes or else you'll have 3 strikes, and 3 strikes are bad and 2 strikes are better. Stop getting so many strikes.

hiro · « **Reply #58 on:** April 18, 2011, 01:45:43 AM »

Strikes are irreversible and can therefore not be removed because they are unremovable!

ShinobiIceSlayer · « **Reply #59 on:** April 18, 2011, 02:25:59 AM »

Neji hasn't made me and Shikki forum mods, which would be weird, especially if Shikki became one, cause he's the spam daddy that likes to spam like a boss.

Shinobi Legends Forum - Shinobi Legends Game Site

News:

Author Topic: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy (Read 24491 times)

Kisame

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

Fork

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

Kisame

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

SuperSeal

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

Kisame

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

hiro

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

Lebis

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

hiro

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

Lebis

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

hiro

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

Lebis

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

hiro

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

Lebis

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

hiro

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy

ShinobiIceSlayer

Re: Rediculously Redundant Statements that have Redundancy