I can see why there are problems about stripping inactive Bijuu from a village or organization. I wanted to stray away from any kind of "superior court" council, though I fear it might be needed. So without further a do, bing bang boom:
============================
Bijuu Inactivity Rules v 3.0
* Note that the words "Village" and "Kage" can be interchanged with "Organization" and "Organization Leader" *
1. If a current jinchuriki is inactive for longer than
2 weeks the bijuu in question shall be stripped of its host and placed under the security of the jinchuriki's kage.
2. While a village houses a host-less bijuu, it is the kage's responsibility to "fight for" and "protect" said bijuu from any challengers if they chose to not hand the bijuu over. This also means that in a jinchuriki match, the kage in question has the possibility of dying just as it is in any other official bijuu challenge.
* Should the defending kage already have their own bijuu (X) sealed within them during the period challenged for the inactive bijuu (Y), they are allowed to use the tails of their own bijuu (X) for any duration of the challenge. They are unable to use the powers of the sealed bijuu (Y) unless they are that bijuu's jinchuriki *3. The kage of the host-less bijuu is given an
unlimited amount of time to distribute the beast to a host. However, until the bijuu is sealed within a host, the kage is responsible for accepting all challenges for it instead.
4. In the event of the inactive host returning to activity while the kage is under the possession of the repossessed bijuu, the kage has the choice of resealing the bijuu back into the returning user. However, if this user becomes inactive again for a period of more than
2 weeks the bijuu will once again be stripped of them and given back to the kage. After this second strike, the inactive user in question will be unable to receive that particular bijuu until it is passed on to a new host and won back via an official challenge.
5. If it so happens that
both the active jinchuriki
and the host's current kage are inactive for a period of longer than
2 weeks, the bijuu shall go to the Bijuu Council
[Members: TBA] for redistribution under their discretion within said village.
============================
I placed the Bijuu Council as TBA since membership is clearly something still under debate.
Oh, and an edited note: We all have different ideas and opinions, so lets keep rudeness or sarcasm out of the equation in this discussion. It will only serve to potentially spur an unnecessary argument.