I read and replied, be happy. >__________>
Looks good to me, though my understanding of the minor kages were that they weren't included. Only the kages of the five great villages of SL. I could be wrong
Though it may seem unfair and whatnot, I agree wholeheartedly. Why? As mentioned prior, anyone can make a clan and claim to be a kage; those who have gained acknowledgement as kage of a primary canon village is known throughout.
Even so there are tons of people as is, without including every Jinchuuriki who ever was. I would think it would be more of an issue, say for instance, if I missed listing one who wished to be on the council as opposed to any other reason.
My input in regards to past hosts is: Don't count them as part of the council. Like I said, this could also be put down by many, but really, keep in mind just how much these beasts have been passed around, etc. -- we can't count them all; of course, you can call it a fallacy, but, if anything, they're still, if acknowledged properly due to reputation, etc., they can still hold strong credibility.
About Grace Periods:
I wish to talk about the one week grace period after a match for the same challenger but not for a new challenger.
I feel it should be for after every match. The focus a challenge takes is huge. The time it eats up is also huge. I feel that if the host wishes to have a week grace period to rest up and to also do other things in their lives besides SL that they should have it regardless if the challenger is a repeat or not. Certainly the repeat challenger should go to the bottom of their list of future fights as usual.
Challenge List for Each Bijuu:
What do you think about having a post that lists the challengers for each bijuu? That way if someone is wanting to become a host they can go to the list and say..."hmmm, the 3 tails only has 2 challengers while the others all have 5 or more, I should go for it." Also this could keep people posted on how long it is until their match
A: The rules state that both parties can agree on a time and place. They don't need to take challenges immediately. The thought had already crossed my mind of consistent challenges.
B: I don't mind that, truly; my only concern is establishing a stable listing, etc. for it that we have access to. I suppose a thread such as this would suffice and someone with access to editing it, perhaps the thread creator, can keep track. I WOULD suggest that individual hosts make individual threads, but that gives them free reign to change whatever challenger whenever.
Furthermore, there is another issue here, almost everyone want to be a jinchuriki cause we canceled most of their disadvantages. Unless being assisted by medical nins during the extraction or having an amazing life force/endurance, a jinchuriki should die when the bijuu is extracted.
Another thing, the result of a jinchuriki battle is quite an official one so if one is killed during one he/she should be considered dead in rp w/o exception. It is an official rp battle after all. Otherwise should not be tolerated even with the consent of both parties, it takes away too many downfalls of being a jinchuriki and growing the balls to challenge one.
Rules state there's the option of stating fatalities, etc. It's up for debate between challenger and such. You can play for keeps, play for claims, whatever. I understand where you're coming from, however -- there's really no drawback of challenging a jinchuuriki or taking challenges as there's no drastic loss besides time and/or a bijuu. I've been fond of the idea for quite some time, but just think of how many people will actually follow with that? It's the reason I exercised the special rules claim.
RAI MUST GET HIS FOX BACK!!!! D:< I demand! >:O
We've talked about this.
The bijuu fights as they are right now, lack realism to a very sad extent.
Fallacy on your part recognized as "Cherry Picking"; in order to establish 'realism', we cannot pick and choose which ones we want or don't want. I.E., hunting a jinchuuriki down in the village, etc. is a 'no', but possibility of fighting to the death is okay.
IF the above is implemented I would also like to suggest that if the dead that result from a jinchuriki challenge wish to be resurrected
Likewise, there's a good sum of people I would not have revived; that said, how would we agree? Democratic voting? Persuasion?
What of bribes, etc?
How can we control them if they choose not to ask to be revived but rather just act alive regardless?
As far as realism goes, take note of the methods of revival we have seen: They're all possessive of the bodies, etc. of those its cast upon, OR it requires a sacrifice of life, etc. How do we then judge upon those factors?
but I thought that you can't kill the host or the bijuu will die or be free to go on a killing spree or some such stuff. I thought that in order to harvest the bijuu you have to NOT kill its host. Disable him and extract it from the living being.
I don't recall any sort of canon fact that states the host can be dead for extraction. Some live during the extraction as it is, etc.
That's exactly my point! People have been ignoring that and such must stop now! It simply voids a good part of the hard work a challenger needs to do as do the rest of the flaws I pointed out.
Get the yolk out of an egg without breaking it, man. That analogy applies here; think of the difficulty of defeating someone without killing them? I mean, in reality, it's so much easier to just drop a host dead and be on with it.
Holding a jinchuriki and challenging one must pose certain risks for a decent balance between gain and loss to exist.
Time is already a factor worth sacrificing.
Point is, it's bs that he rules over 4 of the 9 bijuu. In order to challenge him for one. (As far as I know, I'm not 100% accurate) It's to the death. Meaning he can use everything he has in his arsenal, which is a lot.
Anyways to summarize my messy post;
Zenaku should not be able to rule over all 4 bijuu
If he is illegitimately allowed to do such a ridiculous thing it should not be to the death
Five out of nine.
You can ask him to spare you. He's a good boy.
Hashirama, at one point, held all nine?
Who says it was not legitimate?
which lead up to the formation of the council and the bylaws that we have today.
The "laws" we have now came from me, Camel. The "council" we have now formed through means of reputable people being asked for an opinion.
I assure you Kumo could make a big statue and then let Raifudo play Tobi.
Why the hell do I have to be dragged into this as your dog of war? >>
The claim to be able to harness the bijuu power and use it. Should be banned if one does execute getting all the bijuu.
Who says it's allowed? Rules state it's not allowed of altering them from their canon form; meaning, the statue is a no-go unless the Gedo gets placed in here (which it won't be accepted, etc.).
Rules should be made to where a village can only hold a bijuu for a certain amount of time before they have to pass it on to a host.
Then that defeats the purpose of bothering to challenge someone for a bijuu; likewise, lotteries are rather ignorant. Or, do you propose we elect someone? Because that can easily be a bias form of opinion. Also, someone's hard work of keeping their bijuu would go to waste. I held onto the Kyuubi for two years, man, two. Why? Hell if I know, but that would not be part of my resume' when I apply to be a lawyer in the future if we go with what you want.
Quote from: ShadowX on March 14, 2012, 11:27:47 pm
Zenaku is one of the best rp'ers on the site.(If he wasn't he wouldn't have the 9 tails)
He's one of the best RP'ers due to his creativity; he's the host of the Kyuubi because I gave it to him as a bonus with Raikage when I finished here.
His ability in RP meant nothing to me, it was the devotion he showed to my village that persuaded me.
Now, as far as rewriting the rules goes:
My daily schedule is as followed:
3:30 AM - 8:15 pm M-F.
Sa/Su are my days to handle chores, free time things, etc.
If you're waiting on me to revise the rules, then you're in for a wait. Yes, it's important to me to help satisfy those who have come to me for help, but it's not priority in my life to give up my schoolwork or work-out regime just for this.
Edit: I'm still reading over everything; Zenaku's mentioning of Shadow is what made me respond to the above.
Quote from: Zenaku on Today at 01:06:21 am
My point Shadow is you're going by what other people say instead of coming to me directly. If a challenger wouldn't challenge every week after losing then I wouldn't have to threaten to kill to get a bit of peace and quiet. As for villages being forced to seal a beast? I side with Bocc on that one. I'm not even sure why people think I'm so strong, I only use simple logic.
I could take this chump, c'mon, now.
But, in regards to Zenny-kins being oh-so-over-powdered (yes, powdered, not powered - Kicks and giggles, eesh), think of how it is to fight a bijuu in Naruto. Look at the comparison of skills between the jinchuuriki, etc.
I mean, it takes S-class world criminals who decimated their homes in some way to take down, possibly, a host.
Author
Topic: Bijuu Council and Discussion (Read 57444 times)