Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Blueberry

6 (27.3%)

Blackberry

5 (22.7%)

Greenberry

3 (13.6%)

Redberry

3 (13.6%)

Library

5 (22.7%)

Total Members Voted: 12

Voting closed: May 06, 2012, 10:51:17 PM

[Uchiha, Rares]

Seats opened: 9
May be accepting or removing members later due to various reasons.

[Quest]

Well, regardless of how many members there are, let's make sure that what's going on here does not happen with the chosen council members. It's unproductive and pretty much creates bad blood between members of SL while ruining the images of all parties involved.

[Chika]

That's part of being removed which Rare just stated.

[Uchiha, Rares]

To sum up things. Will only the votes count? Or will we be posting suggestions of multiple people (max 9)? One may have a favorite or so but might just as well have an opinion on 9 people that should be in the council.

[Trev]

I say just the vote should count, as saying all nine defeats the purpose of polling as we could just say it, just my opinion though.

[Kite]

I agree with most of that. Save for the challenger fleeing. The loss should be equivalent on both sides.

Yea I was having a hard time coming up with what could be done about challengers. Does anyone have any suggestions? We could say that if they run a second time they must wait 4 months before challenging again and if they run a third time they aren't allowed to challenge for a Bijuu ever again. RP justification would be after the second time the flee they have an even greater fear of the Bijuu and after the third they fear the power so much that it becomes a lifetime fear. That would mean they would never be able to be a Jinchuuriki.

[Raifudo Oppa]

You're very harsh on your punishments. Think of a 3 month sentence that you can't fight.

How long must you wait to challenge the same host if they run?

[Uchiha, Rares]

Well the original idea was claiming them as dead i.e. banning them from bijuu fights from the first time. Well then.... perhaps it is to be discussed after we get passed the council elections.

I think we already said before that the host would auto lose if it ran.

[Trev]

I agree with Rare, everything discussed here should be talked about when the official council is in place and a vote can be taken upon it.

[Chika]

Yeah, the original idea was for them to be dead. Also, no exagerrated or un-legit ressurections.

[Uchiha, Rares]

But to give a better idea in regards to the reason why punishment is supposed to be drastic:

That rule is meant to by all means stop fleeing, and as such, the challenger should be forever banned from challenges and the jinchuriki should lose the bijuu, perhaps with the same consequence of the challenger added.

Now, that was just to give the general reasoning revolving around that rule, otherwise, the 3 months or w/e could be viewed as "hmmm... well if I get killed... he might also seal me away, leaving me no legit way to come back w/o his will. Of course I'll run! It's just 3 months!"

[KayentaMoenkopi]

The voting...

We will be using nice votes, one for each candidate we wish to elect? Additionally. we will have the option to just keep the council as is? Will that have to be two separate polls? Or can that be set up as follows...

Do you wish a new council?

if no...then you are done.

is yes then cast one vote for each of the nine nominees you wish to see serve.

and then boxes of the names below this.

[KayentaMoenkopi]

On the list of nominees, why is Raifudo listed as 0) and the total are only 25 rather than 26 as of this time?

[Uchiha, Rares]

You can only vote for 1.

Edit:Reason I suggested otherwise a while back is due to the fact that since there are 9 seats, each should be voted upon.
Personally, I'd either suggest that we have people post their list of 9, of course they can also just go for 1 if that is their will.
That or hold 9 consecutive polls. First election, subtract winner, second election subtract winner, etc. But both of those seem like a lot of work.
As a third idea, we could have 9 polls at the same time:
Seat 1, seat 2, seat 3, etc. And at the end we just calculate how much each has in total. The reason this would be a bad idea is because the same person could vote for the same person 9 times.

The optimal way was bolded.

[Chika]

Ideally I wanted votes to be casted publicly, that way an easy process of voting can be established. Everyone posts their suggested 9 council selections, this way some people who have more than one choice that they would want depicting their challenges and others, their choice if they place a reason for which one or not. Some people would just simply rather keep their votes a secret, but Yūmei suggested 'those' people send their votes to someone else for them to place their unknown votes.

A 2 Day election could still be done, also i'm not saying to change the poll voting to this way, just a Suggestion.