Currently, in the Hall of Fame, Player Fights is listed as ALL PvPs initiated by the respective player.
-= Issue =-
My issue with this is that there is no incentive for actually winning. The way it is currently presented, a player could win 5,000 and lose 5,000 but you would still be ranked with 10,000 "player fights". This does not seem to represent the intention of the "Hall of Fame" very well.
-= Proposed Changes =-
I submit one of the following changes:
-= Additional Column(s) =-
Player Fights would stays as is, but would add the following column(s):
"PvP Wins" (only successful PvPs)
and/or
"PvP Ratio" <- PvP ratio is ( wins / (wins + losses) ), example from above 5,000 / (5,000 + 5,000) = .5 or 50% success rate
-= Replacement =-
Replace the ranking with either or both of the columns above. If it were to be replaced, I would like to see it something like this:
Warrior Ranking Link: "PvP Success" (if changed at all from "Player Fights"
Listing once above link selected:
Rank ----- Name ----- PvP wins* ----- PvP Success Percentage ----- Overall Player Fights ----- In PvP Range?
* This would be the field/column on which the descending sort is applied.
-= Reason for this Request =-
Currently, there is little incentive for sitters to choose their battles carefully. People can attack whoever / whenever and they are rewarded with an increase in the Hall of Fame. Fighting a lot isn't HoF worthy in my opinion. Winning a lot is a much better measure.