I remember that Kotetsu took issue with having to defend his bijuu against Yujo because of the way he acted. I also had to quit SL for a time and decided to just forfeit out of my fight with Yujo rather than continue to put up with him. Now Hazama has the same issue. How many times does it need to happen for it to officially be a pattern?
Hm... "patterns" and members having problems with other members, I know quite a few who have messaged me concerning a problem with a few other members. Not a good idea to discuss "patterns" and there are some who may fall victim to that.
I do not like commenting on these types of issues, concerning of role play and bijuu stuff- not my place to.
Since my opinion was asked by a few, here are some options:
a). Hazama, tell your side of the story with facts as to what occurred with a third respected party member. Let me then decide if it warrants the need for someone else to take your place for this fight- the opponent must approve the replacement challenger.
b). Do not discuss the underlying issue with a third party, and discuss let the members discuss it here *IF* you are allowed a temporary replacement for this match.
c). If a and b do not work, no replacement and you must fight to keep your bijuu.
d). Forfeit the bijuu
There are Bijuu rules in place, correct me if i am wrong, but allowing a temporary replacement for this match would then be a special allowance?
If the above question is answered with a yes, then members need to first decide on allowing for that to occur.
Then move on to options a or b.
Feel free to message me with any questions or concerns.