At the very least it would be helpful to explain your vote if you want to amend the rules, since that could be very nearly anything. And if that wins and then no one knows what we want to amend them to then it's just going to take that much longer to sort them out.
As for Uetto I can see, even having been here just a short time, that there are people like you speak of. Power hungry and the like. That being said there are also people who are not like that. I've had no issue with my bijuu fight with Eiko, meanwhile other people can not even successfully do the IC hunt aspect of the rp.
I don't think they need to be universally voided because the current system is not universally failing.
If the original system was flawless and everyone had fun all the time then why on god's green earth was it changed? Just a massive case of fixing something that isn't broken so much you ruin it?
You are saying you want to void them because the system is faulty but the way you're arguing it makes it seem more like it is the people at fault than the system, which I agree with. As a system I don't think the current rules are broken, but they are faulty to a point where people can take advantage of them, and have been, thus this discussion.
Honestly I think a complete void of the bijuu and the rules could cause just as much fracturing as keeping both of them. People who "officially" have a beast will probably not want to accept the people who "unofficially" claim one. What if 9 guys get together and claim to have all 9 bujuu and go around attacking villages with them? Will other Jinchuriki of the same beast fight them? Will they just be voided?
It seems to be that telling people to just rp whatever they want is more likely to cause people splitting into many various groups each with their own "official" set of the rules than amending the rules or voiding just the rules, at this point. From the way you describe it the community is already at least divided into two groups. The people who do not follow the rules and regulations of the forum and those that do. So I would think the end result of what you propose would just cause the pro forum group to fracture further, as we all clearly do not all get along with each other, which is the opposite of what you want.
Not having to rp with people you don't like is great UNLESS you don't like anyone at all. Group A doesn't like Group B and doesn't rp with them and vice verse. But Group C has no problem with either and rp's with both. Well now Group A and B aren't going to accept rp from group C that happens as a result of rp with their rival group, so now BOTH groups are voiding group C, you get what I'm getting at? Only there will likely be more groups and a much more complicated web of voids.