Personally, I would first set a trial run with one of the tailed beasts after the whole Distribution Event. I can already tell you that Miyuu doesn't desire to be part of the whole tailed beast System nor does Koji. They might be open to Terumi's idea, & attempt to Roleplay it out for their villages. I would base my judgement of this idea after watching them test it out for a bit. As for how much time an experimental test run would need to show results or not, I do not know. This test run could serve as a compromise between those who support Terumi's idea, & those do not for the time being. If it yields favorable results, we could try expanding it further and so on.
Sooo basically scrap the system we've all worked towards making better over the last year, even as this topic goes on people are aiming to make improvements... And then force everyone to make a new set of council rules, Bijuu rules, and so on just because you think this might work and that this might be slightly better than what we have going on?
I just... really can't with this topic.
I'm saying that we should give it a shot. Seems like you're irrationally clinging on to a system that has shown itself to still perpetuate the same problems despite efforts to improve on it.
No one is saying that this is guaranteed to be a better system than what we currently have, but we'll never know if we don't try it out.
Also, that isn't an argument as to why this system wouldn't potentially be better than the one we have. You're just citing how it may or may not inconvenience people, which isn't a sound argument. It's an argumentum ad consequentiam: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_from_consequences
I agree completely. This is an IDEA, first and foremost. It's something new to try. It is not the new law or rules. I'm proposing a new change, a new idea, with help from the community to bear fruit.
Hell, all the stuff we have currently can stay ready to go in case it wouldn't work out and we would need to switch back to this system.
Im on my phone and it scrapped my orecious post, so thisll be real brief:
1) The Council should not be both GMing the beasts and enforcing the rules, esoecially if every Council Member is garunteed to gm at least one.
2) No direct biju involvement in combatative RP, period. Kind of defeats the purpose if you ask me.
3) What other than chakra balancing will be implemented to keep certain beasts from dramatically being more valuable to chat with than others?
4) any things if certain major nations are inactive?
1) True; that does propose a conflict of interests then. Then that would leave the options for GMs for the beast could be the 'Kage of the villages, or the actual in-game GMs, or a newly elected group of people who could be trusted with legitimately and neutrally be able to GM their beast. In which ever case, then they would answer to the Council?
2) Only thing I can think of that would allow them to interfere in combative RP is as a last resort for the village, if their village is under siege. Other than that, I can agree that they woildn't need to be summonable then.
3) I'm not sure, to be honest. That would be something that could fleshed out. Because otherwise, it would simply be character preference then and whom they wanna play with OR a religious pilgrimage.
4) That would have to be discussed too. Initially, I would believe that the bijū be stripped from them then and moved to a more active village that doesn't already possess one.