Shinobi Legends Forum - Shinobi Legends Game Site

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New members: you need admin approval, please petition *in game* if you made an account. :)

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE  (Read 652 times)

Ace

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +68/-8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« on: December 04, 2015, 06:08:26 am »

Who is *NOT* allowed to be on the council?

Post here!
Do not digress...

Once most, if not all have posted, subject matter and verdict will be recorded.

Let's go!  :twisted:
« Last Edit: December 04, 2015, 08:07:03 am by Ace »
Logged

Bocchiere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +46/-59
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2224
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2015, 06:11:39 am »

Anyone who currently owns or hosts a bijuu is not allowed to be on the council. Anyone who is the current, active, Kage of a major/active village is not allowed to be on the council.
Logged

UettoSenju

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +38/-63
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1195
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2015, 06:23:53 am »

Anyone who currently owns or hosts a bijuu is not allowed to be on the council. Anyone who is the current, active, Kage of a major/active village is not allowed to be on the council.

I think this right here nailed it. I have to agree with what Bocc said.

I would add in a probation for those stripped to be on the council... perhaps that is for another vote though?
Logged

Ace

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +68/-8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2015, 06:26:49 am »

Anyone who currently owns or hosts a bijuu is not allowed to be on the council. Anyone who is the current, active, Kage of a major/active village is not allowed to be on the council.

I think this right here nailed it. I have to agree with what Bocc said.

I would add in a probation for those stripped to be on the council... perhaps that is for another vote though?

Yes, create another topic with VOTE at the end of it! :D
Please be clear with topic subject name.

Recap, Kirk votes for the motion as presented by Bocc.

And i do as well!

Continue!  :twisted:
Logged

Mortiferous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: +5/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2015, 06:34:31 am »

I stand with Bocc here. This way things and secretive motives do not get in the way of voting. Those who hold a high position of power should not be on the Council.
Logged

KayentaMoenkopi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +87/-94
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2280
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2015, 06:43:45 am »

I vote:

No current hosts or bijuu owners.

No Kage whose village has a host or owner. I agree no Kage of a village with a host or owner, cause that would be a conflict of interest if one had to be stripped. No one wants their warrior's stripped.

However, we are short on possible council members so... like Chusaki would be fine cause Suna doesn't have a bijuu. Becquerel would be fine too, Oto has no beasts do they? Is Ryoji still Oto or is he considered his own group now, the Boshoku? It is hard for me to keep up with host affiliations sometimes. Miyuu would be fine cause Iwa doesn't have one either.

Since they would not be judging matches...I see Kage's with no beasts in their village being an issue, even if a challenger is from there. But should that change...I feel they should step down.
Logged

Court

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +16/-24
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 145
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2015, 06:46:45 am »

Vote:
-No current hosts or owners of a bijuu.
-No Kage who possesses a village member with a bijuu.
-No potential judges of a bijuu fight (more like the council member can't judge a bijuu fight once nominated)
Logged

Suishou Koji

  • Site Staff (Game Master)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Karma: +35/-18
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 271
  • Elder of Shinobi Legends
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2015, 07:05:32 am »

My vote:

- No current hosts or owners of bijuu.
- No Kage of village with a bijuu within.
Logged
I'm the Raikage. Yep, kind of a big deal.

Hades

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +14/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 148
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2015, 07:06:07 am »

I also vote for this.

No current hosts/owners of beasts.

No kage. The allotment for whether or not anyone in their village has a beast seems like too much of a technicality to me. As Kay mentioned, someone in their village could challenge for a beast, win, and then that person would have to step down off the council. I think that's getting to intricate, and it would require updating the council roster more frequently.

Just leave at it no village leader/kage.

EDIT: I do think I have an opinion on whether council members should or should not judge biju matches. I do not think it matters.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2015, 07:14:18 am by Hades »
Logged

Camel

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +155/-136
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2606
  • 01010100 01100001 01100011 01101111 01110011
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2015, 07:40:21 am »

I stand firm on my decision that no current and *active* Kage should be allowed to hold such a position nor should the *current* Jinchuuriki as it may cause conflict amongst the group should certain issues arise.
Logged

Nathan

  • Site Staff (Moderator)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Karma: +30/-42
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 363
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2015, 02:02:10 pm »

I stand firm on my decision that no current and *active* Kage should be allowed to hold such a position nor should the *current* Jinchuuriki as it may cause conflict amongst the group should certain issues arise.

This. Basically, nobody with current power should be given more power. Even if a 'Kage lacks a Jink. in their village it could still pose problems as Camel said.

Eric

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +100/-100
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3472
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #11 on: December 04, 2015, 06:51:17 pm »

I stand firm on my decision that no current and *active* Kage should be allowed to hold such a position nor should the *current* Jinchuuriki as it may cause conflict amongst the group should certain issues arise.

This is my vote also.
Logged
Anything you can think of I can't think of, let me know; that's how the sharing circle works.

Mei

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +39/-37
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 747
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #12 on: December 05, 2015, 02:28:05 am »


No kage. The allotment for whether or not anyone in their village has a beast seems like too much of a technicality to me. As Kay mentioned, someone in their village could challenge for a beast, win, and then that person would have to step down off the council. I think that's getting to intricate, and it would require updating the council roster more frequently.

Just leave at it no village leader/kage.

EDIT: I do think I have an opinion on whether council members should or should not judge biju matches. I do not think it matters.

That's a good point, but we have seen such 'bijuu hunting' taking months anyway. >.>
Maybe there should be a rule that a challenger (representing a village) should notify their Kage of their 'pursue'. That way if the Kage is in the council, he would have time to find a replacement IN THE CHANCE that his village will own a bijuu.
Logged

Warren

  • Site Staff (Game Master)
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Karma: +58/-51
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 897
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #13 on: December 06, 2015, 05:11:22 am »

No current hosts

No active kages of villages with hosts
Logged

KayentaMoenkopi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +87/-94
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2280
    • View Profile
Re: Council Member Requirements (who is *NOT* allowed) VOTE
« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2015, 11:13:55 pm »

This seems to be going well but needs conclusions. Those who have not voted should do so.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
 

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 21 queries.