You can only challenge a bijuu host for a specific bijuu once.
If I challenge Athos for the 8 tails with 16 characters I still only get one fight with him for that bijuu.
Can one person challenge the host for all of their bijuu at once....well in that case I think there should be a cool down added to it. Like 1-2 weeks in between each challenge.
Except the current rules states that each character you challenge him with gets their fight despite it being all one player. Hence why I made the topic to begin with. <.<
**After losing a challenge, you may not challenge the same host for the same beast for three (3) months. However, you may challenge this same host for a different beast in his possession without waiting.**
The highlighted red part says otherwise unless I'm reading it wrong.
I can send 16 alts after one host, but of those 16 I send I still only get 1 fight out of it.
In the same sense I can send 16 alts after Athos's bijuu, but I can only do 1 fight per bijuu.
It's not a current rule. As the rule implies, it's that specific character that goes on cooldown.
Hence why I made the topic in the first place but you kind of shot it down as evidenced here:
1) Can an individual player challenge with multiple characters simultaneously?
1a) If so, does that player then inherit the entire challenge list that comprises of their alts?
2) Does a "loss" automatically initiate the cooldown of the other player's characters if allowed to simultaneously challenge?
3) Can a single character mass challenge for all the Bijū?
3a) If so, can that indidivual have more than one Bijū challenge happening at the same time?
1: You can challenge a host with multiple bijuu for all of their bijuu with different accounts at the same time.
1A: This doesn't have a defined rule that I'm aware of.
2: No, the 3 month cooldown is based on bijuu, not character.
3: Yes. I could (and anyone else) challenge everyone at once if I wanted to.
3A: Yes. Most matches are OOC.
--------------------------------
So as it is the only issue I see is the 1a question. Ryoji can technically challenge Athos on all of his alts for a specific bijuu.
I don't like the idea of someone flooding a challenger's list with alts though. We should add a rule for that.
--------------------------------
Even though Ryoji is doing this out of pure spite there isn't a rule he's breaking.
After losing a challenge, you may not challenge the same host for the same beast for three (3) months. However, you may challenge this same host for a different beast in his possession without waiting.
-----------------------------
Regardless of what happens Ryoji can only fight Athos 4 times. After that he has 3 months to wait.
Now, you're kinda flip-flopping on your argument.
How is he flip-flopping anything? .-. All you did was highlight in red different parts of the same quote. Doesn't make sense.
I don't get how you aren't understand what Shadow is trying to say. So let's use you as an example.
Let's say you have the Three, Four, and Five Tails Dart. And then, all at once, I decide to challenge you with Athos, Hazama, Kuron, Bocchiere, Taiga, Desare, and Kaze. And I challenge you for all three of your beasts. And then Trev challenges you.
So your current challenge list is;
Athos
Hazama
Kuron
Bocchiere(ET)
Taiga(ET)
Desare(ET)
Kaze
Trev
You're telling me it makes more sense to fight me seven times in a row before someone else gets to fight you for a beast instead of me losing once, being forced to cooldown, and then we fight again after other people actually get a shot? >_> What part of that makes sense to you?
WAITNow that I am thinking about this, when the big redistribution for the Bijuu happened, it was stated before they started that whoever you fought in the tournament, that fight would count as their challenge and initiate the three month cooldown period. It was exactly the reason Ryoji was making me jump through circles to get in an early challenge for the Nine Tails.
So, by using that logic, we already have our answer. And I was in that tourney, so was Shadow last I checked, and so were you Dart. So using previously agreed to terms, we already have our answer .__. that the rule applies to the person behind the account and not the characters. Otherwise it would be flippin' retarded.