Correction, the only plot hole was the damage done to Obito prior to the activation of Izanagi. I mean, you would think that it would've negated that damage, but I guess the author just added it for dramatic plot development.
It's not hard to explain Izanagi, but it is hard to precisely calculate time limits and post limits in forum role-play. In a literal sense, Izanagi is a Waboku. (Yu-Gi-Oh reference.)
If Trev doesn't give his ruling before stepping down, it would fall on us to work this issue out or have Eric finish what Trev started. I suggested that we revise the action of Izanagi to only last that one post and after that I have an eye left to work with, along with a follow up action from one of my previous actions. Entirely up to you on what path you want to take, I highly suggest that we put our differences aside and continue on with this match, unless you want to stall this fight a bit longer.
I understand the damage gets negated but each time Danzo gets hit he "dies" vanishes and then reappears. That takes a second so you wouldn't literally be running forward nonstop. That's all I mean.
Oh, no you wouldn't be a walking tank with the abilities of Izanagi. The damage will still chain to Izanagi and that damage simply becomes an illusion and I can continue on as of nothing happened. You can argue that you could use that window to counter attack, but like I said. I am also chaining Izanagi to *all* damage, which would have to resolve first before anyone tries to retaliate. If it lightens the burden on your shoulders, I will only get invulnerability that will come with a time limit of one post per eye. (Sage Mode or Senju genes doesn't change the post count. I am guessing everyone is cool with that? Never heard any agreement from anyone else, except from Athos.)