Shinobi Legends Forum
Game Development => Feature Requests => Clan Requests => Topic started by: Ace on March 07, 2008, 03:23:16 AM
-
Even though the price has gone up to make a clan, we need to make it a little more harder, at least that's what I think.
LoB's clan price is 100 gems and 100,000 gold, I wonder how many people are actually willing to agree on that.
Of course there are other options though.
We need to figure out a suitable price to make a clan.
-
I think 100 gems and 100,000 gold is reasonable, actually. It determines who are really willing to make a clan and scares off those who just want a quick and easy way to power.
-
How about some kind of fee...Like x gems/gold per month payed by clan leaders/founder
-
How about some kind of fee...Like x gems/gold per month payed by clan leaders/founder
Doubt it.
-
I think raises prices for clans could help, stop the millions of clans we have now lol.
Though every month, no way!
-
Being a clan leader usually makes everything harder - you need to care for your members etc.
So why should you even pay that much just to have a harder SL time, although it can be funnier with others?
I think clans that don't reach 10 members in a month be deleted
-
10, I say 20
-
I would say 5
-
5 members? That's so easy to reach..
20 should be fine, but total loser leaders obviously can't reach that if you take a look at some clans :O!
-
Not everyone wants a big clan look at <Gaurd> they are thrid on the most clan dks list!
-
10, I say 20
People would start making other accounts just to make sure their clan dosen't disaapear, a person could do other 19 accounts and make them apply to his clan.
I think that it wouldn't work :(
-
Just make the price 100 gems and 100,000 gold. .-.
-
If members build a clan by paying enough gems and gold, what right do we have to destroy that clan just because they don't have enough members?
This topic is here to set the price of a clan, not to discuss when clans will be deleted.
If you want to talk about that then make a new topic please.
I agree with 100 gems and 100,000.
Yeah....it is a big jump.
-
If members build a clan by paying enough gems and gold, what right do we have to destroy that clan just because they don't have enough members?
This topic is here to set the price of a clan, not to discuss when clans will be deleted.
If you want to talk about that then make a new topic please.
I agree with 100 gems and 100,000.
Yeah....it is a big jump.
I say definitely. There are tons of people who make clans the second they hit jounin. That doesn't seem very...realistic.
We have like 250 clans at the moment...probably more.
-
I agree with the idea of 100 gems and 100,000 gold, that way less clan will start appearing.
-
I agree with the idea of 100 gems and 10,000 gold, that way less clan will start appearing.
Dont you mean 100,000 gold Jin?
-
I agree with that large price, or raising the bar, a Jounin that only played the game for a couple weeks is not ready to start a clan and lead people
-
I agree with the idea of 100 gems and 10,000 gold, that way less clan will start appearing.
Dont you mean 100,000 gold Jin?
yeah 100, 000 gold, sorry for my mistake xD I will fix it.
-
No problem Jin
-
Having a higher price would be a lot better than a minimum number of members...
-
Having a higher price would be a lot better than a minimum number of members...
All in favour of higher clan prices, raise your hand!
*Raises Hand*
-
And everyone that already has a clan has to pay the price if they want to keep it. =)
-
Harsh... I love it =3
-
And everyone that already has a clan has to pay the price if they want to keep it. =)
You're a mind reader.
Now I won't be able to make that other topic I wanted too. xD
So, do you guys actually agree with the new price of 100 gems and 100,000 gold?
-
And everyone that already has a clan has to pay the price if they want to keep it. =)
Deal.
-
And everyone that already has a clan has to pay the price if they want to keep it. =)
when is the dead line?
-
And everyone that already has a clan has to pay the price if they want to keep it. =)
That would be tottally unfair on Clan Leaders that have had a Kekkei Genkai...
-
Or those that werent told they were gonna lose there dwellings and have to buy them back -.- but I can pay for the new cost already :P
-
So it would be best if leaders did not have to pay the price, again!
-
And everyone that already has a clan has to pay the price if they want to keep it. =)
That would be tottally unfair on Clan Leaders that have had a Kekkei Genkai...
does it matter? nope
-
I think it does ^^
-
I won't like higher prices for clans because even more clans will be bought for DP then because they don't want to waste the gems!
And a weekly price (or monthly^^) for the leaders is also not okay =/
I think the member thingy would be the best >_< A good clan has to be active and the more members the more active the clan is.. and then the 100 or more 1 member clans will be punished!^^
-
I won't like higher prices for clans because even more clans will be bought for DP then because they don't want to waste the gems!
And a weekly price (or monthly^^) for the leaders is also not okay =/
I think the member thingy would be the best >_< A good clan has to be active and the more members the more active the clan is.. and then the 100 or more 1 member clans will be punished!^^
I don't feel we have the right to destroy another persons clan just because they don't have enough members. Let them get bored of it and eventually give it up to someone else, or destroy it.
Do the small clans REALLY bother you?
Please think about this question and be honest.
If so, in what way?
What do you mean when you say, "Even more clans will be bought for DP?"
Clans cannot really be bought for dps.
-
Member thing, why?
No way. Look at the clans with small amounts of members. Not ALL are weak or pathetic. What about rp-ing clans that only have 4 or 5 members. They're completely active, but don't WANT more members.
-
and why should a clan be destroyed when they spent the same amunt of money as the rest of yo?
-
Doom, the right answer to that is they shouldn't, just as you said.
-
Has Neji seen this?
-
When he doesnt answer he read it and doesnt like it
-
When he doesnt answer he read it and doesnt like it
Not exactly true.
Once members have agreed on this then he might post here.
-
Waiting for opinions?
Has anyone said they don't like it? I mean, it's good for SL, knowing we won't get to 300 clans yet...
-
Waiting for opinions?
Has anyone said they don't like it? I mean, it's good for SL, knowing we won't get to 300 clans yet...
I think the lowest anyone will be able to afford a clan will be Sannin so it will make a difference though it will stop Clans from growing quite as quickly. It will not help that much because people will still have clans...
-
But many clans are made by jounins AS SOON as they hit jounin. Then they just quit and die off.
-
Quote from an old thread...
They can :) I wanted to raise the prices for a clan, but most complained, so I let it go.
Personally, I won't take any clan for full if it's run by academy students...
-
But most aren't complaining, are they?
I think there should be an ingame poll on it.
I'm sure there's people who disagree, but none are speaking up.
-
well since you mentioned that no one is speaking up.Personally i dont like this wouldnt it just be easier instead of raising the price to just make the option of making a clan put up to a higher rank?
-
Wouldn't work; there'd be clan selling... that's how acads lead clans .-.
-
Why does everyone care about a lot of clans? More people play the game now, it is only natural more clans will appear, just like more cities would appear it a population grew in a country. You don't have to join their clan do I don't see the problem of them making a clan they've hoped to get. The only fair way I can think of it to not allow any person under Jounin to get a rank 30-31, however I know some people will disagree.
-
Why does everyone care about a lot of clans? More people play the game now, it is only natural more clans will appear, just like more cities would appear it a population grew in a country. You don't have to join their clan do I don't see the problem of them making a clan they've hoped to get. The only fair way I can think of it to not allow any person under Jounin to get a rank 30-31, however I know some people will disagree.
The problem here might be, a Jounin makes a clan and he/she lets a Genin have rank 30, and the reason might be that the Jounin needs help running the clan, rank 30 has a little more power than the rest of the ranks.
Also, currently a Jounin or higher can have rank 31, founder rank only.
well since you mentioned that no one is speaking up.Personally i dont like this wouldnt it just be easier instead of raising the price to just make the option of making a clan put up to a higher rank?
What rank were you thinking of?
-
Why does everyone care about a lot of clans? More people play the game now, it is only natural more clans will appear, just like more cities would appear it a population grew in a country. You don't have to join their clan do I don't see the problem of them making a clan they've hoped to get. The only fair way I can think of it to not allow any person under Jounin to get a rank 30-31, however I know some people will disagree.
The problem here might be, a Jounin makes a clan and he/she lets a Genin have rank 30, and the reason might be that the Jounin needs help running the clan, rank 30 has a little more power than the rest of the ranks.
Also, currently a Jounin or higher can have rank 31, founder rank only.
well since you mentioned that no one is speaking up.Personally i dont like this wouldnt it just be easier instead of raising the price to just make the option of making a clan put up to a higher rank?
What rank were you thinking of?
Well how about the clan is deleted if no one has entered it after a certain amount of days? I'd really hate to see someone who wants to make a clan be denied. When I first made a clan I loved it, I couldn't stand it if someone tld me I couldn't make one.
-
well given the population of my clan i dont like that idea.
Why does everyone care about a lot of clans? More people play the game now, it is only natural more clans will appear, just like more cities would appear it a population grew in a country. You don't have to join their clan do I don't see the problem of them making a clan they've hoped to get. The only fair way I can think of it to not allow any person under Jounin to get a rank 30-31, however I know some people will disagree.
The problem here might be, a Jounin makes a clan and he/she lets a Genin have rank 30, and the reason might be that the Jounin needs help running the clan, rank 30 has a little more power than the rest of the ranks.
Also, currently a Jounin or higher can have rank 31, founder rank only.
well since you mentioned that no one is speaking up.Personally i dont like this wouldnt it just be easier instead of raising the price to just make the option of making a clan put up to a higher rank?
What rank were you thinking of?
Anbu or Anbu captain
-
Why does everyone care about a lot of clans? More people play the game now, it is only natural more clans will appear, just like more cities would appear it a population grew in a country. You don't have to join their clan do I don't see the problem of them making a clan they've hoped to get. The only fair way I can think of it to not allow any person under Jounin to get a rank 30-31, however I know some people will disagree.
The problem here might be, a Jounin makes a clan and he/she lets a Genin have rank 30, and the reason might be that the Jounin needs help running the clan, rank 30 has a little more power than the rest of the ranks.
Also, currently a Jounin or higher can have rank 31, founder rank only.
well since you mentioned that no one is speaking up.Personally i dont like this wouldnt it just be easier instead of raising the price to just make the option of making a clan put up to a higher rank?
What rank were you thinking of?
Well how about the clan is deleted if no one has entered it after a certain amount of days? I'd really hate to see someone who wants to make a clan be denied. When I first made a clan I loved it, I couldn't stand it if someone tld me I couldn't make one.
Well I see it this way, if someone makes a clan by paying the appropriate amount of gold and gems, why it should it be deleted just because no one joined in X days?
Didn't they make a clan fair and square?
Some might have just got the clan from hiher ranked members.
Also, they can just create alts.
-
Why does everyone care about a lot of clans? More people play the game now, it is only natural more clans will appear, just like more cities would appear it a population grew in a country. You don't have to join their clan do I don't see the problem of them making a clan they've hoped to get. The only fair way I can think of it to not allow any person under Jounin to get a rank 30-31, however I know some people will disagree.
The problem here might be, a Jounin makes a clan and he/she lets a Genin have rank 30, and the reason might be that the Jounin needs help running the clan, rank 30 has a little more power than the rest of the ranks.
Also, currently a Jounin or higher can have rank 31, founder rank only.
well since you mentioned that no one is speaking up.Personally i dont like this wouldnt it just be easier instead of raising the price to just make the option of making a clan put up to a higher rank?
What rank were you thinking of?
Well how about the clan is deleted if no one has entered it after a certain amount of days? I'd really hate to see someone who wants to make a clan be denied. When I first made a clan I loved it, I couldn't stand it if someone tld me I couldn't make one.
Well I see it this way, if someone makes a clan by paying the appropriate amount of gold and gems, why it should it be deleted just because no one joined in X days?
Didn't they make a clan fair and square?
Some might have just got the clan from hiher ranked members.
Also, they can just create alts.
I never said because no one joined, I said if no one enters the clan hall for a set amount of days. Say someone makes a clan, but they become inactive and don't play anymore, then the clan would disappear after the set amount of days. This woudl get rid of most of the 1 person clans.
-
but what happens if no one wants to join a clan because it is small or if they are trying to recruit but they had to go to sleep away camp for a set amount of time and they still had only a one person clan?
-
Why does everyone care about a lot of clans? More people play the game now, it is only natural more clans will appear, just like more cities would appear it a population grew in a country. You don't have to join their clan do I don't see the problem of them making a clan they've hoped to get. The only fair way I can think of it to not allow any person under Jounin to get a rank 30-31, however I know some people will disagree.
The problem here might be, a Jounin makes a clan and he/she lets a Genin have rank 30, and the reason might be that the Jounin needs help running the clan, rank 30 has a little more power than the rest of the ranks.
Also, currently a Jounin or higher can have rank 31, founder rank only.
well since you mentioned that no one is speaking up.Personally i dont like this wouldnt it just be easier instead of raising the price to just make the option of making a clan put up to a higher rank?
What rank were you thinking of?
Well how about the clan is deleted if no one has entered it after a certain amount of days? I'd really hate to see someone who wants to make a clan be denied. When I first made a clan I loved it, I couldn't stand it if someone tld me I couldn't make one.
Well I see it this way, if someone makes a clan by paying the appropriate amount of gold and gems, why it should it be deleted just because no one joined in X days?
Didn't they make a clan fair and square?
Some might have just got the clan from hiher ranked members.
Also, they can just create alts.
I never said because no one joined, I said if no one enters the clan hall for a set amount of days. Say someone makes a clan, but they become inactive and don't play anymore, then the clan would disappear after the set amount of days. This woudl get rid of most of the 1 person clans.
I don't see where you said, clan hall.
You said, "Well how about the clan is deleted if no one has entered it...."
I probably thought you meant the clan by the word "it."
Anyways, if a member is inactive doesn't their character get deleted after 45 days?
So the one person clan would then be destroyed.
About not going into the clan hall, they can just post something and done.
How many days were you thinking?
-
Why does everyone care about a lot of clans? More people play the game now, it is only natural more clans will appear, just like more cities would appear it a population grew in a country. You don't have to join their clan do I don't see the problem of them making a clan they've hoped to get. The only fair way I can think of it to not allow any person under Jounin to get a rank 30-31, however I know some people will disagree.
The problem here might be, a Jounin makes a clan and he/she lets a Genin have rank 30, and the reason might be that the Jounin needs help running the clan, rank 30 has a little more power than the rest of the ranks.
Also, currently a Jounin or higher can have rank 31, founder rank only.
well since you mentioned that no one is speaking up.Personally i dont like this wouldnt it just be easier instead of raising the price to just make the option of making a clan put up to a higher rank?
What rank were you thinking of?
Well how about the clan is deleted if no one has entered it after a certain amount of days? I'd really hate to see someone who wants to make a clan be denied. When I first made a clan I loved it, I couldn't stand it if someone tld me I couldn't make one.
Well I see it this way, if someone makes a clan by paying the appropriate amount of gold and gems, why it should it be deleted just because no one joined in X days?
Didn't they make a clan fair and square?
Some might have just got the clan from hiher ranked members.
Also, they can just create alts.
I never said because no one joined, I said if no one enters the clan hall for a set amount of days. Say someone makes a clan, but they become inactive and don't play anymore, then the clan would disappear after the set amount of days. This woudl get rid of most of the 1 person clans.
I don't see where you said, clan hall.
You said, "Well how about the clan is deleted if no one has entered it...."
I probably thought you meant the clan by the word "it."
Anyways, if a member is inactive doesn't their character get deleted after 45 days?
So the one person clan would then be destroyed.
About not going into the clan hall, they can just post something and done.
How many days were you thinking?
Maybe 20-25, and I am just targeting inactive people with clans, people who porbably don't want them anymore anyway.
-
A limit on clans?
I don't know anymore.
The huge clan list is obviously a problem. A solution that's reasonable for all is hard to find.
-
... and what is wrong with a huge clan list anyways?
-
A lot><
You want 213102391024123981283129041293123123012 clans?
-
A limit on clans?
I don't know anymore.
The huge clan list is obviously a problem. A solution that's reasonable for all is hard to find.
That wasn't what I was talking about, read back. And I think anyone should be allowed to make a clan, I don't see why you are making such a big deal about it.
-
Anyone can make a clan. But there's just so many. 250 last time I checked.
-
what's wrong with 250 clans exactly?
other than the fact that you have to scroll through a list, there's nothing bad.
-
The problem is not the huge clan list, it is how easily you can make a clan.
This request is supposed to make it harder to make a clan.
-
Neji already made categories so that it is easier to find a clan, I don't see a problem.
-
Neji raised the price in LoB, did he not? Did anyone complain? No. Make the price 100 gems and 100,000 gold and be done with it already. -.-
-
Neji raised the price in LoB, did he not? Did anyone complain? No. Make the price 100 gems and 100,000 gold and be done with it already. -.-
No one complained because it was how the game started out, 25 gems and some amount of gold was the original price in Shinobi Legends, I don't tihnk it should be changed.
-
If people want an easy way to achieve a clan then leave the price the same I guess.
Didn't we want to make things a little harder here?
If some of you don't like this idea, please give out different options.
-
Neji raised the price in LoB, did he not? Did anyone complain? No. Make the price 100 gems and 100,000 gold and be done with it already. -.-
No one complained because it was how the game started out, 25 gems and some amount of gold was the original price in Shinobi Legends, I don't tihnk it should be changed.
Then should we let people just create clans so easily when they're still giddy from the 8th kill, only to have said clan stagnate when the creator becomes inactive? Thus far, raising the price is the only plausible solution to this problem...unless, as Ace said, you have another option.
-
... whjy make it harder to make a clan?
what is the point that you are trying to accomplish here?
what is exactly bad about lots of clans?
-
... whjy make it harder to make a clan?
what is the point that you are trying to accomplish here?
what is exactly bad about lots of clans?
When did I say that it is bad that there are too many clans?
The problem is not the huge clan list, it is how easily you can make a clan.
This request is supposed to make it harder to make a clan.
The point to make it harder to get a clan.
SL should have somethings to look forward to.
If a member wants a clan real bad, they will play the game and earn the gems and the gold.
Why should it be easy to get one?
I just thought it is easy to make a clan.
Maybe an in game poll would help, but then again, someone might say do we need to have a poll for everything?
-
And people can make clans whenever...
Becoming a clan founder...shouldn't this be something hard to accomplish?
There's no point if anyone can just make a clan. That's what is happening really. When you hit jounin, you make a clan.
-
we have reached a point where a majority should decide.
as we agree on lifting or staying where we are...
give me 2 more prices.
a) current price
b) higher price
c) highest price mentioned here
once I have it, I'll conduct a poll
-
a) Current price ( I believe) is 35 gems and 20,000 gold
b) Higher price (just an idea) is 75 gems and 75,000 gold
c) Higher price mentioned here is 100 gems and 100,000 gold
-
... whjy make it harder to make a clan?
what is the point that you are trying to accomplish here?
what is exactly bad about lots of clans?
When did I say that it is bad that there are too many clans?
The problem is not the huge clan list, it is how easily you can make a clan.
This request is supposed to make it harder to make a clan.
The point to make it harder to get a clan.
SL should have somethings to look forward to.
If a member wants a clan real bad, they will play the game and earn the gems and the gold.
Why should it be easy to get one?
I just thought it is easy to make a clan.
Maybe an in game poll would help, but then again, someone might say do we need to have a poll for everything?
I'm sorry but what was the point of making a topic if you don't think a lot of clans is a problem? I'm just wondering since I thought that was your intention.
-
... whjy make it harder to make a clan?
what is the point that you are trying to accomplish here?
what is exactly bad about lots of clans?
When did I say that it is bad that there are too many clans?
The problem is not the huge clan list, it is how easily you can make a clan.
This request is supposed to make it harder to make a clan.
The point to make it harder to get a clan.
SL should have somethings to look forward to.
If a member wants a clan real bad, they will play the game and earn the gems and the gold.
Why should it be easy to get one?
I just thought it is easy to make a clan.
Maybe an in game poll would help, but then again, someone might say do we need to have a poll for everything?
I'm sorry but what was the point of making a topic if you don't think a lot of clans is a problem? I'm just wondering since I thought that was your intention.
That was not my intention.
My intention was to make it harder to make a clan.
You shouldn't be able to make a clan this easy.
Lets make making a clan a little more special.
a) Current price ( I believe) is 35 gems and 20,000 gold
b) Higher price (just an idea) is 75 gems and 75,000 gold
c) Higher price mentioned here is 100 gems and 100,000 gold
I agree.
Those that do not agree with changing the price to make a clan, why do you think it should be stayed the same?
Also, if you are going to reply to this, please include the prices for the poll.
-
See, this is why I think there should be a poll. No one here is speaking against it (a few are). And I know for a fact there's more than 3 people who don't want this.
-
Last time I made a clan (awhile ago so it might have changed, the price was 25 gems and 10,000 gold.)
I think that if people really want it to change, that the price be 50 gems tops, with 15,000 gold.
-
The price now is 35 gems and 20,000 gold.
-
The price now is 35 gems and 20,000 gold.
Then the Price should be 50 gems 25,000 gold? What do you think?
-
65 gems and 50,000 gold.
The high amount of gold will hold the lower levels off.
-
I kind of change my mind.
a) 35 gems and 20,000 gold
b) 55 gems and 55,000 gold
c) 100 gems and 100,000 gold
The reason for the change was that 75 gems and 75,000 seems to be leaning towards 100 gems and 100,000 more than the other option.
Best to make this fair.
What do you guys think?
EDIT: Ignore this please
-
I kind of change my mind.
a) 35 gems and 20,000 gold
b) 55 gems and 55,000 gold
c) 100 gems and 100,000 gold
The reason for the change was that 75 gems and 75,000 seems to be leaning towards 100 gems and 100,000 more than the other option.
Best to make this fair.
What do you guys think?
Fair^^
-
I kind of change my mind.
a) 35 gems and 20,000 gold
b) 55 gems and 55,000 gold
c) 100 gems and 100,000 gold
The reason for the change was that 75 gems and 75,000 seems to be leaning towards 100 gems and 100,000 more than the other option.
Best to make this fair.
What do you guys think?
Looks good to me
-
This is probably the last time.
I made a mistake.
a) 35 gems and 20,000 gold
b) 65 gems and 65,000 gold
c) 100 gems and 100,000 gold
The reason for the change was that 75 gems and 75,000 seems to be leaning towards 100 gems and 100,000 more than the other option.
Best to make this fair.
What do you guys think?
-
Good again>>
-
100 Gems and 100,000 gold?
I like this idea as it would mean less clans but it would promote clan selling if someone is indeed stupid enough.
-
I don't think there's a way to fully stop it...kinda like account selling.
-
So, say everyone chooses option C, then obviously everyone who has a clan already has to pay the difference or they get their clan deleted. =)
-
So, say everyone chooses option C, then obviously everyone who has a clan already has to pay the difference or they get their clan deleted. =)
Your paying the gems for my clan, since there being spent on cityhouses again
-
So, say everyone chooses option C, then obviously everyone who has a clan already has to pay the difference or they get their clan deleted. =)
Your paying the gems for my clan, since there being spent on cityhouses again
Cry me a river. =)
-
.. and tape it :D
-
i agree with baluski, the clan should get like 2 weeks to pay off the remaining gems and gold. I suppose the module could be like the X-mas trees where everyone can pitch in.
-
Again, this might have already been mentioned, but just in case . . .
Increase the price (100 gems + 100,000 gold seems fine with me, but can that be paid over time like dwellings instead of all at once?) but also increase the rank of those that can found clans. I say move it from 8 DKs to 25 or 50 DKs. Just my opinion.
-
hail to all jounins who have 100 gems +100k gold.
I also said nothing about people having to pay up to the new price, I'd rather leave it as it is.
(clan destroyers will take care of weaker clans)
-
Would be better if only kage (30++) can found a clan <_<
What would a jounin clan leader be like? weeeak
-
Love option C :]
-
grr, the way the votes are going looks like the prices are staying the same -_-
-
Hmm at current 77 votes went towards A, which if you look at poll overall, most votes went towards raising the price so I dont think prices cant stay the same since most voted for a higher price
-
If the votes are too close, I'll make a vote without option B, to see where the folks from there go.
-
Would be better if only kage (30++) can found a clan <_<
What would a jounin clan leader be like? weeeak
Rank has absolutley NOTHING to do with how well a clan is run...Just thought you should know. Ive seen Jounins who are on a higher maturity level then some Grand Hokages.
-
Would be better if only kage (30++) can found a clan <_<
What would a jounin clan leader be like? weeeak
Rank has absolutley NOTHING to do with how well a clan is run...Just thought you should know. Ive seen Jounins who are on a higher maturity level then some Grand Hokages.
True, a 13 year old Grand probably wont run a clan as well as a 34 year old jounin
-
If the votes are too close, I'll make a vote without option B, to see where the folks from there go.
I think I know where those votes might go toward.
If members voted for option A, why would they pick option B?
It might seem like a big jump to them, but we will see.
-
It wasn't about how a founder leads the clan..
But it's only logical that a strong and wise person should lead a clan and no unexperienced
And the age doesn't really matter, maybe the common sense does
-
If they really want to lead people they will pay the gems and money, by sitting there a little and getting the gems, I have jounin i play a little and he has over 100gems
-
Sitting isn't even needed, only for the money, 2-3 game days :P
-
I think this game should have like 20 clans tops. You know just to keep it realistic so im all for the idea of making it uber expensive.
-
Age matters none...
I am 14, leading a clan since age 12.
-
i thought you were older >.>
-
i thought you were older >.>
Don't feel like counting how many times I've gotten that>>
-
Age matters none...
I am 14, leading a clan since age 12.
it doesn't take much to lead a clan o.O
-
Yes it does!
Leading a good, active, happy clan takes an hour atleast each day.
-
Yes it does!
Leading a good, active, happy clan takes an hour atleast each day.
That's not much
-
It's enough.
I interrupt playing time for my clan all the time, it's not like you just sit around and your clan is suddenly known as the most fun clan ever.
-
yeah, that's kinda obvious tau >.>
-
yeah, that's kinda obvious tau >.>
Or is it, some people get lucly with massive friends lists!!
-
<<
It looks like they're going to stay the same.
-
New poll then
Poll A) How many dragon kills must a clan founder have (founders with a KG don't count)
1) 8
2) 25
3) 50
Or just that every clan founder has to have atleast 20 persons in the clan in a month else it will be deleted
-
I don't think another poll about something else should be started just yet.
It seems as though the poll is leaning towards keeping the price the same, but there are still members who want the prise to go higher.
-
OR we keep taking polls until the numbers say what we want them to say :roll:
Its looks like prices the are going to be the same, Even if it was repeated with only two options, about half would go for the lower and the other for the upper..
So you just have to deal with it in the end. Is it really a bad thing? The fun/active clans will prosper, the neglected ones will die off. If you don't like how long the clan list is, just look at the Hamlet Registry...
Its just one of the things that gets bigger as SL gets bigger too
-
New poll then
Poll A) How many dragon kills must a clan founder have (founders with a KG don't count)
1) 8
2) 25
3) 50
Has already been put up before & majority voted "8 DK".
-
And the second one?
-
Use search.
-
I think czarguy is right it should be realistic, there is only like 20 clans so far in the series and manga anyways, so why have like 300 different clans? The game is based on Naruto, and half the time the game is realistic and half is not, like how we name our own clans, what ever, and how there are so many.
Maybe resetting for a KG could come with a clan, maybe, since you would be born into [Name it] along with your KG, and more clan options, a lot more, will come with more resets, like a Grand Master should have more power in clans then just an Initiate.
-
What the hell are you talking about? <_<
This idea.. is the worst I've ever heard (after my ideas xD^^)
-
if there is only one gamabunta/kyuubi/.... why can more have it.
if there is only one hokage, why do we have 50
if there is only one ...
you know where this is going to...
-
if there is only one gamabunta/kyuubi/.... why can more have it. -> they can use clones
if there is only one hokage, why do we have 50 --> hokage of -49 generation, hokage of -48 generation
if there is only one ...
you know where this is going to...
know but we must do something against all this 500 clans
-
that's why I never interfered with clan destroyers. natural selection of weaker clans through ingame means.
-
clan destroyers wont pick 1 member clans i guess. theres nothing to destroy
-
c'est la vie.
the prices, on public decision, won't be lifted.
The gap is too large for a decisive poll without the 2nd option.
-
if there is only one gamabunta/kyuubi/.... why can more have it. -> they can use clones
if there is only one hokage, why do we have 50 --> hokage of -49 generation, hokage of -48 generation
if there is only one ...
you know where this is going to...
know but we must do something against all this 500 clans
Honestly, what would be the problem with 500 clans?
-
I see what you mean neji. I don't have a problem with the amount of clans, just how realistic it is how there are so many. I guess it wouldn't be a game anymore if we had 1 hokage, one mount, etc. Sorry for my suggestion it was terrible
-
if there is only one gamabunta/kyuubi/.... why can more have it. -> they can use clones
if there is only one hokage, why do we have 50 --> hokage of -49 generation, hokage of -48 generation
if there is only one ...
you know where this is going to...
know but we must do something against all this 500 clans
Honestly, what would be the problem with 500 clans?
was that not th question that I've been asking all this time? >.>
the only way that I could see a problem in that many clans is having to scroll :/
-
if there is only one gamabunta/kyuubi/.... why can more have it. -> they can use clones
if there is only one hokage, why do we have 50 --> hokage of -49 generation, hokage of -48 generation
if there is only one ...
you know where this is going to...
know but we must do something against all this 500 clans
Honestly, what would be the problem with 500 clans?
was that not th question that I've been asking all this time? >.>
the only way that I could see a problem in that many clans is having to scroll :/
Browsers have a search key.
-
if there is only one gamabunta/kyuubi/.... why can more have it. -> they can use clones
if there is only one hokage, why do we have 50 --> hokage of -49 generation, hokage of -48 generation
if there is only one ...
you know where this is going to...
know but we must do something against all this 500 clans
Honestly, what would be the problem with 500 clans?
was that not th question that I've been asking all this time? >.>
the only way that I could see a problem in that many clans is having to scroll :/
Browsers have a search key.
what if you're joining a random clan? >.>
-
don't quote 10 posts... just the one before please.
-
Maybe a suggestion: instead of having one column of clans, have like 3 groups of columns, for ppl with like 50+ members, then another for like 15-49, then another for like 14 and bellow. just a suggestion, so every clan is there without scrolling too much, and You would have headings for groups
-
If you have the time to click on the group, you can also scroll down for two seconds :D
And the search function wont help if your clan has a name like : <MøôÑ> Må§këÐ MôøÑ Wªяяiøя§
-
No not click a gropu it will just show a list of groups like:
A..... B...... c.....
[clan] [clan] [clan]
-
If you have the time to click on the group, you can also scroll down for two seconds :D
And the search function wont help if your clan has a name like : <MøôÑ> Må§këÐ MôøÑ Wªяяiøя§
Then don't use a name like that.
-
If you have the time to click on the group, you can also scroll down for two seconds :D
And the search function wont help if your clan has a name like : <MøôÑ> Må§këÐ MôøÑ Wªяяiøя§
let me ask you this.
who makes a clan with their name like that?
-
A few people like joker, and ppl use it in their names too, obviously, but anyways a little off topic we are talking about prices right?
-
copy and paste, search the regular part of the name.
-
Ah darn.
Prices aren't going to be lifted :-?
Ah well, I don't care too much
-
shouldn't we ask the 65-gem-voters if they'd be fine with 100 (or something between 65 and 100), too? the majority voted "lift" after all. =O
-
shouldn't we ask the 65-gem-voters if they'd be fine with 100 (or something between 65 and 100), too? the majority voted "lift" after all. =O
I think that's what was being said before.
-
Keep Current: 35 gems and 20,000 gold (730 - 51.5%)
Lift A: 65 gems and 65,000 gold (123 - 8.7%)
Lift B: 100 gems and 100,000 gold (565 - 39.8%)
Did the majority really vote for a lift?
IF Lift A was taken out of the poll then most of the members who voted for that option might just vote to keep the current price, I don't really know. IF Lift A was taken out and all you have is keep current and Lift B, wouldn't they vote to keep the current price instead of voting to raise it even more then they previously voted for?
-
woah, sorry. bad short-term memory.
-
Then we all should of changed the vote to Lift A, that way it at least doubled the price.
Cause I think after awhile people looked between the B and current and said I want price higher but thats too high and voting A is pointless so they vote for current
-
Both lifts work for me. Honestly, it's a big price change. I doubt as many people would be making clans if they were that price.
-
That's our goal, no?
We need (much) less clans
-
My complaint was not the many clans.
The price to make a clan should be raised to make it harder, that was the point.
-
But it should only be harder because there were too many, no?
-
I think he's trying to say...
Clans are too easy to make. It seems like any old jounin can be a clan leader these days (even though they really can't).
-
since when is clan leadership skils determined by rank?
it takes a while to get 35 gems
-
I gain about 30 gems every day :P
-
find me a jounin that has that many gems... without sitting
-
I have 80gems on my jounin running through fast speed, cause he has a cityhouse etc, and experience player running him through, its not hard at all
-
well you know what,you're all lucky >.>
-
It's not about rank. Someone else suggested making it that you must be a higher rank to make a clan.
-
Even if the Jounin does sit and manages to get 100 gems, I think that person will think a bit harder before making a clan.
Its not necessarily the price for the sake of taking the gems away, its meant to deter wishy-washy clans and clan leaders.
-
It'll stop the ones who are just like "hm, I have extra gems...I want to make a clan!"
-
ehh i'unno, my alt has 157 gems =/
only 8 oro kills, he got them all by himself too...
i'm so proud of him :cry:
-
There was no need to revive this for a useless reply xD But spam > all so hoo cares
-
There was no need to revive this for a useless reply xD But spam > all so hoo cares
ehh it was at the top of the page so i said go for it xD
plus im bored =/
-
Several days old only>>
-
yep it was 4 days old xD
-
On Topic: I just spent every gem I had then in two game days gained enough to create a clan, so I would say it's too easy. By the time I was a jounin I had about 250 gems before I spent at the peddler, mount, and cityhouses
It's like kondaime said, it's not the number, it's how easy you can make it.
-
Exactly. Are we not having another poll?
-
I've been trying to ignore this thread, but you guys are taking it too far. Are we going to keep having a poll until *you* get the result that *you* want? You guys can debate about this all you want, but it's clear that the majority doesn't want clans to be more expensive.
Based on the result of the in-game poll,
Keep Current: 35 gems and 20,000 gold (790 - 52.7%)
Discussion is over.
-
If even 2.7% of the ppl that chose the other option chose to raise it between the two though, it would be a tie. Obviously if they want a raise in prices then they will most likely choose to raise it, given another poll, than keep it the same.
-
your math is flawed...
there was already a middle ground in the poll, and even if 2.7% were to want lower than the middle ground, neji would probably toss out the votes with the lowest percentages, and the people in the middle would probably go to the current price
-
Too bad the poll is over, discussion is over and you're just denying the enviable.
-
Whatever, I shouldn't have even said a thing. I was just trying to see someone else's point.
-
Imagine how you'd feel knowing you want a clan of your own, yet you gotta pay tons of money for one? Isn't fair..
Glad it stayed the way it was.
-
Don't...revive...for something that isn't absolutely necessary.
-
That is true but puting that up to less than 10 per month or else deletion would get rid of the pathetic clans with leaders that meerly bother i think it would halfen the numbe of clans.