1
All That Is Bijuu / Re: 犀犬, Saiken The 6-Tailed Slug (六尾, Rokubi) Challenge/Preferences Thread
« on: January 04, 2019, 04:04:09 PM »
Add me to the challenger list.
Please petition corrupted/Badnavs in game, nothing can be done from the forums.
Confesses at last to prank calling Kirk for about a month now...
it was a fad.
but a fun one!
You know what? I'm coming back for my spot at the top 3.
o.O I summoned the dead.
It'd be cool to be exempt from the rules, still at work currently. I mean, this rule xD
@Gyu
I work Thursday through Sunday >> Yeah I haven't replied yet, I dun wanna during work times.
@Kamui
Soon as in soon, like I've said(I know you've missed it though, so don't worry), I wanted the redistribution to go hand in hand with the IC Rules. If I can't get that, then rejoice in the fact that I have ready handed out one of the Beasts that I had o.o To someone who can do the Bijuu game good.
@Kirk
I love you, but come at me, bro.
^obviously a joke and a pun on us being brothers xD
Please pardon me for not knowing, as you all should already know, I haven't been around the forum for quite awhile and missed out on a lot of stuff. I see pseudo Jinchuuriki the same way I see players with EMS, Rinnegan or a combo of both, so I don't really see how having a few Kinkaku & Ginkaku running around can be any worst than seeing Pain & Madara everywhere.
But I am not going to make a thread to try and overturn the decision to not allow non-host to have Bijuu chakra. I'll respect that decision regardless of my own opinion.
I stick with the argument on my opening post, I see no benefit in letting a single player hold onto multiple Bijuu indefinitely, only how it takes Bijuu out of RP, and the danger of someone creating any army of zombie Jinchuuriki. Yes, no Jinchuuriki is going to bother challenging other host/summoner for their Bijuu, but this will not kill Bijuu RP because others are going to want to take that Bijuu away from its current host. Not to mention that Athos is probably not using every Bijuu that he is currently holding. And even if he is, they are probably nothing more than giant beasts that he summons onto the battlefield. Compare that kind of RP to having a player mature with his Bijuu and RP its personality.
Do you guys know how the 1st official list of Jinchuuriki was born? If you want a Bijuu, you post a short RP involving said tailed-beast. The person who does it the best was chosen as the official host. What have Athos done with the Bijuu lately?
If a time limit that gets shorter the more Bijuu you have is unacceptable, then I stand firmly on having a hard limit of 1 Bijuu per player.
Soo... You're basically admitting you started this topic with me specifically in mind and not actually changing the rules? >> Didn't like looking at me from all the way down there, while I sit on my 'throne' made of collected Bijuu?
Actually, if you want to get technical, Gyu. You remember how the first bijuu list was actually made? .-. Raifudo got sick of everyone running around and claiming ten-twenty Nine Tails and then went around and cleared things up >_> How would I know? Because I had a friend who was one of those BS Nine Tails users, Naruto Uzumaki, and I remember when he said something about the Bijuu and was essentially told 'Nah, this is how it's working, screw you scrub.' That being said, maybe things happened differently at the very beginning but it was legit right back to hunting and killing people for their beasts.
Like, things weren't great with the beasts back then but what made it work was that not everyone was just Madara or Naruto with a bunch of OP shit. Back then, we were all, like, Jounin-level and having a Bijuu actually made a difference. Back before everyone had infinite chakra and could move faster than the speed of light. I've learned the hard way, from myself and Eric doing it all the time, that mentioning the old days does nothing but confuse people >_> Things worked differently back then because things WERE different back then.
So, bite me.
I wish we could just fight our disagreements out in RL. It'd make thing so much easier. Just beat the hell out of each other.
You will always have that guy (or gal) to bring a gun to a fistfight or a knife to a fistfight. Nah, if you think people are backtabby now, translating these issues to RL... *shivers*.
Because the irritating part about the arguments is that most of them are blatantly fallacious. By arguments, I mean the formal process of presenting a sound and valid argument. Not shouting at each other and having pissing contests.
Well, if the (presidential, important to be clear) Election is anything to go by, presenting sound and valid arguments is less important than convincing the deciders. I could argue that the sky is blue, and thus air is blue, and if my goal is to convince some kids that the air is actually blue, then a sound and valid argument is hardly needed if they are convinced of it.
Similiary, you don't have to be absolutely correct, objectively speaking, to win a decision in a biju match. You just gotta convince the judge(s) and/or Council members of your cause. Sure it helps to be right, but being convincing is more important in this setting.Oh cool they even have a word for what people would actually use this for.
Fallacy-dropping
“”What we have here is a blatant example of argument by assertion (http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_by_assertion). It's therefore clear your mother was a whore, and you flunked out of elementary school.
—Colonel Custer[10]
It is not acceptable to merely state that one's opponent is using a fallacy (as above). One must explain how the opponent's argument is fallacious (eg, they claim that you are a shill), why it is wrong (there's no evidence that you are a paid government disinformation agent), and what that means for their argument (if you're not a shill, then your arguments can't be hand waved away) [11].
This need not be a drawn-out paragraph. Even "your ad hominem is irrelevant to my argument, so my argument stands" is sufficient.
Otherwise, one runs into the risk of fallacy dropping -- claiming someone's argument is wrong without bothering to explain why -- which comes dangerously close to ad hominem. (It's equivalent to shouting "your logic is bad!" and claiming victory.)
That's what I imagine the majority would be just copy and pasting words from this page as to why someone is wrong without actually understanding them.
Lol.
I'm sure about 90% of the people who visit the forums won't be malicious with your phone....but perhaps you shouldn't post it in the open for everyone to see. This forum isn't private. >>