31
Naruto / Re: Naruto Gaiden: Chapter 7
« on: June 11, 2015, 09:19:38 PM »New OP villain? lol I want to see Madara fanboys now.
Ever wondered if your ideas have been talked about in the forum already? Well, try out the "search" option, where all your questions can be answered.
lol just search "guns in naruto" or something similar in google and you'll find links to it.See, Keito's got it. Basically, everything that can be done with 'technology' is already done by chakra or already presented in a way within the anime/manga. So people who are using 'technology' as a basis to their characters/inventions/jutsu, are just painting something that already exists a different color.
And people seem to forget that Naruto does have guns in it. Or at least, Kiri does.
http://www.mangareader.net/93-24-7/naruto/chapter-19.html
Look behind the counter.
Basically, the way I look at it. Just RP with anyone and everyone. If you have an issue with anything they have/do, question them. Just send them a friendly PM saying, "Hey, I don't understand *thing*, could you explain why/how your character has it?" Or something like that. Just don't be nasty to each other like some players tend to be.
Did you just look up guns in Naruto or something? Because I cannot even wrap my head around how you saw that minute detail, and remembered it for this thread after it being 14+ years since that chapter was released.
The whole reverse engineering process just seems questionsble.
If you can learn a technique like Hiraishin by just "reverse engineering" it then it loses it's recognition as a lethal technique and becomes equal to the bunshin jutsu, a technique that is only effective if you know how to use it.
If this is being accepted then Hiraishin is as good as mine, not that I want it.
Reverse engineering isn't even simple enough for this to be possible since each Hiraishin user has their own seal, from my understanding, making it almost impossible to decipher the technique unless you are the person himself. Also it isn't a machine where you can take it apart and figure it out. It is a sealing formula which could just be something the user made from the top of his head and can't be found in any scrolls.
So Shadow( or Madara >>) would be right in not understanding how it works because no one is giving a good enough reason for how reverse engineering the technique is a valid option. Anyone up for reverse engineering Edo Tensei?
Every technique is limited by the experience and expertise of the user. Even hiraishin.
Assuming Isaribi uses the the Three Tails for him to pick up on its chakra.To have that much insight he would probably need to train a lot and then maybe need senjutsu to sense the bijuu. The odds of him even finding Isa within the village would be slim unless he was Madara. The Byakugan has more insight then the Sharingan but it doesn't let you sense chakra. You might be able to see something different about someone's chakra but for all you know they may be under a genjustu. Also there is not only the jinchuriki within the village, you would have to find all the odd looking chakra's and verify them.
Things are starting to get a bit heated for this topic today, which has reached 8 pages already.That is a good idea. .
Maybe everyone should get some sleep or something. I'm thinking about locking this topic until morning if there's going to be more crap-slinging back and forth, with no real contribution to the topic on hand.
You'll have to wait for Isa himself since I'm getting tired at this point. Proof of his activeness is all that is really needed. Thanks for explaining this, its saved me the trouble of reasoning with the opposing side. This will probably decide who is right.Please do not even tell me that because you have come to be really irritating. Providing nothing effective to back up your claim besides ONE untrustworthy picture and biased witnesses that you probably got to agree with you.
Before you go on about, people not following the bijuu rules, make sure you have 100% legit evidence.
You are asking for proof of a negative, you know. The proof of burden is on him being active rather than him being inactive. Reason being that it's much much harder, if not impossible to prove something HASN'T happened.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic_burden_of_proof#Proving_a_negative
So instead of showing him being NOT active, the proof is in showing him NOT being active, which I for one think the amount of testimony is proof enough of that. But keep pressing if you don't believe so, just keep it in line.