16
Rules/Foundation / Council Member Host Ratio and Challenges (Discussion)
« on: April 02, 2017, 07:03:46 PM »
As it was brought up in another thread by one of our members I figured it only fair to have a discussion about it for the community as a whole. Let this discussion remain civil and to the point.
Should Bijuu Council Members be able to issue tailed beast challenges when the ratio of the current Council has been filled?
Personally, I say yes. If they win, they can opt to step down or give the tailed beast to someone else who will then have the new updated grace period applied to them (3 days I think), if they lose it goes on as business as usual. It would make things less complicated than having to step down just to issue a challenge and throw the council seating into disarray by challenge alone. Though it's not an option I would push for, we could in fact alter the potential ratio with a new vote if the community wishes it.
Should Bijuu Council Members be able to issue tailed beast challenges when the ratio of the current Council has been filled?
Personally, I say yes. If they win, they can opt to step down or give the tailed beast to someone else who will then have the new updated grace period applied to them (3 days I think), if they lose it goes on as business as usual. It would make things less complicated than having to step down just to issue a challenge and throw the council seating into disarray by challenge alone. Though it's not an option I would push for, we could in fact alter the potential ratio with a new vote if the community wishes it.