Shinobi Legends Forum - Shinobi Legends Game Site

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please report outages in the thread "messages/server outages", Thanks.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Uchiha, Rares

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 69
1
Village Square / Re: Tools.
« on: August 07, 2012, 02:16:22 PM »
And how exactly did these people come in possession of Kumogakure treasures? To my knowledge, at the beginning at least, the SSM swords were all in the mist.

2
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: August 07, 2012, 01:56:46 PM »
Edited by Camelicious.

~Come speak to me if you have any problems with my edits.

Edited by Camelicious.

~Come speak to me if you have any problems with my edits.

3
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: August 06, 2012, 11:56:55 PM »
Woah, Solo sounding smart,  I must have walked into an alternate dimension on my way back from the bathroom.

Don't let him fool you. 8D

A. Well forgive me for considering that you having a particular opinion is a vote. Are votes not directly proportional with one's opinion? :P

B. You're kind of being plain stupid with "well just because we voted for the 3 days...." given that it was clearly stated that a limit is being implemented so we don't lag for weeks due to others not being on enough and what not. In addition, you mentioned something about contacting them I believe, they were ALL made aware over a week ago that discussions on various matters will begin, as such, notified that they should frequently check this thread.

C. That was essentially the matter we were discussing mainly, weather the Mizukage should or shouldn't be entitled to stripping her. If you actually bother to look back on it, you'll see a bunch of "I vote for" in the comments of people.

4
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: August 06, 2012, 08:12:31 PM »
Edited by Camelicious.

~Come speak to me if you have any problems with my edits.

5
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: August 06, 2012, 09:53:38 AM »
Even if the small council is chosen, how would you pick the members to participate? I think that's an even bigger problem that needs to be addressed. As someone who will not be on the council, this is a big concern. I suppose you could use the one the people voted on, but some deem that invalid, due to slight tampering.

I did not say I view every member as competent. Simply that if this council was good enough to vote on bijuu matters then it is good enough to vote on council ones.

I believe there is one day left or so.

To explain how this would go down:
Essentially, if you voted against this or chose to stay impartial to it it would essentially mean that:
Your willed number is the current 22(I think) and your member list is the current one or that you don't care. As such, if this does get passed in means of cut-down having the majority, the majority of those that voted for such will be the majority out of those that voted for the cut-down. Essentially a poll within a poll. Referring to the masses was a mistake to begin with, a third of the people that voted back then did not even know enough candidates to compose a full list while others just wanted their friends to make it.

Bottom line, if you did not want the cut-down to begin with or chose to stay impartial to it, you are not entitled to deciding who will compose the list you opposed creating to begin with.

So far:
Cut-down

Yes-5
No-2
Impartial-1

1/5 did not state number. 4/5 agreed with 9.
2/5 did not establish or support a listing. 3/5 agreed to my list.

As such, if it were to end right here and now, the result would be my list of 9. I suppose that if enough complain about the actual listing being integrated in the same poll, we'd have to scrap the election part out. However, at this point, even if I am to consider that the 2 that did not establish or show support for a list do not agree with mine, my list still has the majority of 3/5.


How about this? If the number of supporters of a particular list does not surpass the number of no-cut-down votes, we'll just decide on who the members shall be later on. I think it's more than fair this way.

Edit:
So essentially, if you wanted to go the worst way possible, the polling in regards to my list would be something like:
2-no(supporting current list)
3-impartial
3-supporters

6
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: August 06, 2012, 02:06:49 AM »
Well given that the composing of lists was a partial fail since mine was either agreed upon or no list was given, I'm guessing we could just limit the results of this poll to limit or no limit and the number.

As for what you address as an issue. That's rather incorrect. Given that the current council is one that votes on council/bijuu matters and decides such matters by votes, there is no reason for the election of the 9 or w/e to make an exception. If we were enough to decide on relevant bijuu/council issues, we are enough to decide upon the 9 members if the limitation is favored by the majority. I believe there's something like 1-2 days left to vote.

EDIT: Bottom line: Those that currently hold the power to decide upon bijuu/jinchuriki rules and issues are those best suited to decide just who will do so in the future. The list found on the first page is the council until the new one is elected.

Edit2: In addition we can always count those that did choose to compose a list or agree to one. If we were to do that given that my list is the only one in existence, with two supporters to top it, we should be going for that. But I can see people thinking I bit more than I could chew by adding the list of members in the same poll so I'm leaving that part up for debate.

Edit3: Also, you kind of stated that the council that is currently deciding on these matters in general is unorganized and unfair. >>;;;

7
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: August 06, 2012, 01:55:45 AM »
I asked that people also state the number of members they think should be the limit as well as who should be in it.

So far I am the one that made the first list of members, Bocc and Nathan agreed to my list.
Raifudo agrees to the fact that a limit is in order.
Asadi thinks the 9 member limit I suggested seems fine(I think)
Rakudo is impartial.
Kayenta is against the limit.

So far we have:
4-5 Yes to the limit
1-2 impartial
1 against.

3(including myself) agreed to my list. While the other two that find it that the limit is alright did not compose a list. So if it were to all end here, I'd suppose we'd go with my list based on the above results.

I specifically asked that those that vote also compose a list of members to their according number so we can get this issue dealt with all in one shot.

8
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: August 06, 2012, 12:10:11 AM »
Wel, if someone does prove a point, I'd be opened.

'Stubborn' or not. xD
 
Besides, isn't it the job of this 'council' to listen to others before going blindly and voting like mad men?

Essentially, "they" are there cause their judgment is not "blind", and trusted. But sure, somethings may escape them so an outsider pointing out an aspect that was not seen may very well cause others to change their votes.

9
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: August 05, 2012, 11:54:56 PM »
Splendid.

10
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: August 05, 2012, 11:41:39 PM »
So, pretty much what some folks are wanting is a small council. We could do the 9 who have the ability to vote and those that want to voice their opinions who are not on the council can do so in a chance to sway the council member's personal opinion.

Something like that sound good?

Yep, that would be what we're hoping for.

11
Naruto / Re: Naruto 593
« on: August 05, 2012, 11:01:45 PM »
DOUBLE POSTERS! Y U NO USE "modify"?!

12
Naruto / Re: Naruto 596
« on: August 05, 2012, 11:00:31 PM »
It's iffy but it ain't like that. xP
For instance if you were to focus on the window itself you wouldn't see the person as clearly. But no, you are focusing on the person rather. Me thinks.

13
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: August 05, 2012, 10:44:34 PM »
I would like to personally thank Bocc and Nathan for the great example they are setting for us all. By that I mean, opting for what they believe to be right in spite of such being in their disadvantage. You two are inspiring.

14
Naruto / Re: Naruto 596
« on: August 05, 2012, 04:11:21 PM »
But focusing on the person. It's like how the entire space between you and the target is not igniting in black flames, just the target.

15
Discussions / Re: Village Changes (Rework)
« on: August 05, 2012, 04:08:08 PM »
You have castles. <<

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 69

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 30 queries.