38
« on: August 29, 2017, 07:02:05 AM »
I suppose beforehand, with owner and challenger, one could agree to a certain judge to set specific rules like if 'I see you retroposting 3 times in a row and I feel like you're not going to recover, you'll be penalized somehow'. Also, there'd have to be something where the person getting the retro post penalty couldn't cop out and demand a new judge, provided both the judge and the opponent can provide proof said person agreed to such willingly, and in full knowledge of the consequences.
With tailed beast matches people seem to get carried away on how to DBZ take down their target in the biggest bang possible with numerous stacks of super powers. People can get bored real fast, especially when matches move super slow, and the material used by their opponent is written in a fashion of 'Oh, so you're a super human demi god, please do tell me more."
So with stacking offenses, mistakes, and how long a singe post can take to be put up, I can see the value of wanting to 'just get it over with'. Thus the answer would be to just ask the judge openly 'Hey, if so and so does a move you see as modding, slap a severe penalty on them the next time they do it.' As for how 'open' the asking would have to be, dunno.