31
Rules/Foundation / Re: May players retain the passive abilities of previously mastered biju? (vote)
« on: February 24, 2017, 01:37:38 AM »
Yes
Please petition corrupted/Badnavs in game, nothing can be done from the forums.
Just seems like a waste of time to discuss things we all already do, that have always worked. I'm pretty sure if someone was going to dispute not being able to host multiple bijuu they would have done it at some point between now and the start of SL and that hasn't happened. It's a rule, anybody who knows bijuu fights knows it's a rule. It's not going to cause any problems and nobodies going to complain if that's added to the rules without a topic about it unless they just feel like being contrarian.I don't think anyone's saying that it should be a thing, my only argument is it's not technically illegal as it stands now.
Exactly. It's not in the current rules, so it doesn't apply, even if you follow it regardless. If it got put back in the current rules, then that's another matter. But as it stands, you could potentially master every bijuu in 15 weeks total.Well it is in fact a rule you can't host multiple beasts. It was in the old rules and I'd imagine it's not in the new ones because it is so implicit no one even thought of it.
Implicit for people who were around and involved in biju during that time. If some fresh blood were to actually enter the biju scene (as has happened before) the precedent falls to "well, it's not against the rules".
I don't see a rule saying you can't have multiple sealed inside you. In fact, the only even remotely relevant rule I can find is: "There is no limit to the number of bijuu one person can own." Maybe it's common courtesy here to only have one, but if there isn't a rule, then you can be sure someone will use that to their advantage at some point. If someone sealed every bijuu in them, then there are no rules saying mastery is one at a time. So in the potential scenario where someone gets all of them at the same time and seals them all, it'd be 15 weeks total. And even I think it's kind of stupid, but there's nothing stopping it.It takes 15 weeks to master a Bijuu and there are 52 weeks in a year Eric so there's no way you could master them all in under a year unless you've already mastered all but three.That's assuming that you wait to capture each one until you've mastered the last. I don't remember anything in the rules saying that you could only master one at a time, so if you captured all 9 at the same time, it'd only take the 15 weeks, not 135.
There is no rule against it, but how would you master them all at the same time? You can only master a biju and gain it's abilities when it's sealed inside you and you master them. So you'd have to seal the Reibi, master it, take it out and throw in the Ichibi, etc. Then if you have all biju it becomes more problematic, as the other biju you have that aren't sealed inside you are to be treated as summons. Which means they hate you, which means you may never be able to fully master it since it will forever hate you.
Edit: Or I suppose the user could keep the other biju sealed away and not as a summon, but still, I don't know how you would master more than one at a time, as I believe you need them sealed inside you to gain the abilities?
It takes 15 weeks to master a Bijuu and there are 52 weeks in a year Eric so there's no way you could master them all in under a year unless you've already mastered all but three.That's assuming that you wait to capture each one until you've mastered the last. I don't remember anything in the rules saying that you could only master one at a time, so if you captured all 9 at the same time, it'd only take the 15 weeks, not 135.
Seriously though, it's like they have to be reminded every other week that they're not Congress, they're the Supreme Court. If it's another thing the 1st group can claim, it's that we never tried such blatant power grabs.Could just have a vote and get it into the rules sooner. Why would this be forwarded to the Council?
... But if you guys want these to be included in the actual rules, once the biju council is up and running, and enough people want them explicably stated, the community can forward it to the council.
It involves Bijuu so it makes sense that the council itself would also vote on it.
Why does the Council need to be forwarded it? The Council's job is to rule on rule violations, anything else they do biju related is as players, jinchs, etc. The Council would be voting right along with the rest of us.
The council's grasp on what exactly their job can best be described as "tenuous at best".