Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

16

Village Square / Re: Skeleton Key

« on: May 13, 2014, 02:41:49 PM »

17

Village Square / Re: Akatsuki is abolishing summoning contracts

« on: May 09, 2014, 04:41:26 AM »

Acuna lacks the resets necessary to learn Senjutsu. I vote he earns his right to use it before trying to claim anything related.

Alternatively (in reference to the OP) you can just ignore him and all of Akatsuki altogether if you don't approve of their summoning-contract-abolishment clause.

18

Naruto / Re: Naruto 675(Read now)

« on: May 07, 2014, 02:42:19 PM »

Please tell me Obito actually killed him...

19

Village Square / Re: Akatsuki is abolishing summoning contracts

« on: May 05, 2014, 02:56:12 PM »

On the wikia, no. On the forums, maybe. The other claiming threads you listed that kamui was the contract holder, but he did die. As Raifudo said, free game now.

Zojin's name is bolded, indicating she's the new contract holder.

20

Village Square / Re: Akatsuki is abolishing summoning contracts

« on: May 05, 2014, 02:51:58 PM »

Isn't Kamui the contract holder for slugs, though?

No? Their's no page nor any content to back that up.

Really?

21

Village Square / Re: Akatsuki is abolishing summoning contracts

« on: May 05, 2014, 02:48:16 PM »

Isn't Kamui the contract holder for slugs, though?

22

Village Square / Re: Akatsuki is abolishing summoning contracts

« on: May 05, 2014, 02:15:30 PM »

Why not just create a variation of x Sage Mode?

23

Village Square / Re: Akatsuki is abolishing summoning contracts

« on: May 05, 2014, 06:04:46 AM »

I believe that if we are allowed to summon toads without a contract and learn the sage mode, then all canon sage modes are to be learned the same way.  As it currently is there is inconsistency in the rules.  No toad contract but everyone summons toads.  There is a snake contract and only certain people can sign that.  So what are the real rules we're following in regards to canon summons? (There is also a slug contract I believe, but I lost track of that one a while ago)  Do we make a toad contract for someone to hold and effectively limit all canon sage modes?  Or do we abolish the snake contract and let snake sages roam as free as toad sages do?

Toads are treated as a default summon, because generally people with a single reset in that Sage branch are able to summon toads in-game, the general rule of thumb being "If I can use it in-game, then I have a right to use it in RP" (assuming certain conditions are met; i.e. going to Mount...Toad and signing the contract there (because nobody's carrying it around), or for the Rinnegan going through the "S > MS > EMS > EMS + Mokuton > Rinnegan" process). Fact of the matter is no single person is carrying the summoning contract for toads, though somebody possesses the contract for snakes.

I don't know about what others think about it, but I'm comfortable with the establishment of a scroll for toads and making all newbies to the Sage Mode reset find their own summon to establish Sage Mode for (it does sound harsh though).

24

Village Square / Re: Akatsuki is abolishing summoning contracts

« on: May 05, 2014, 02:36:33 AM »

In short, this is not a discussion topic, these are the rules my clan will be following, don't like it? Don't rp with us. If anyone wants to continue to be a troll and say, "I invented Dogs/Snakes/Sharks, no one can have them without my permission!"  then be my guest, I will be ignoring you as you will no doubt be ignoring me.

Jinchuuriki should totally take this to heart if they don't want to deal with Akatsuki. Akatsuki's leader gave the O.K! (No takebacks)

25

Village Square / Re: Bijuu rules modification: Case 2

« on: May 05, 2014, 01:36:41 AM »

If it's just a once-per-year exemption, then why not?

26

Village Square / Re: Akatsuki is abolishing summoning contracts

« on: May 05, 2014, 01:34:11 AM »

RIP Bijuu Conquest.

27

Village Square / Re: The lazy Jinchūriki of sl

« on: May 04, 2014, 04:54:08 PM »

I don't have a reason to just go on a random walk; it isn't how I am.

Try ocean fishing.

28

Village Square / Re: Bijuu rules modification: Case 1

« on: May 04, 2014, 04:49:51 PM »

My thought is not everyone can always post all the time because we have lives. Chill out dude.

Would 3 weeks (over 2) be easier for you? If not, then you might want to consider giving somebody else your bijuu and forgetting about this mess; think about it, seriously.

29

Village Square / Re: The lazy Jinchūriki of sl

« on: May 03, 2014, 04:52:10 PM »

Going away to some foreign village almost defeats the purpose since they will have their own hidey hole system that you'll have to go through. This is fine, but if we're making them leave their home village just for them to go to another fortified village, if they travel using Kamui or something like that, it kind of defeats the purpose of the regulation in the first place.

Then why don't the invaders use Kamui as well, then?

If they can't (barriers being picky about who can and can't do it), then they'll need to adopt a different approach. For instance, does every village have such a barrier, and did the jinchuuriki access a village without one? Establishing extensive information networks would be a good step into coping with this.

30

Village Square / Re: The lazy Jinchūriki of sl

« on: May 03, 2014, 11:09:06 AM »

And this rule about a Jinchuriki needing to be outside their village can be easily exploitable. For example: What if Zen decides to take the local acads of Kumo to the woods just outside the village for a camping trip? I'm not saying that we need to change it, but I'm just saying that it's within the rules to do that, since that alone runs it's risks for both sides.

If Zen's making himself more easily accessible, then what's the problem? The fact that defenders can reach him faster? Well attackers can reach him pretty fast too, so big deal.

The only reason I agree with the leaving the village rule is that pretty much every village but Suna is impossible to infiltrate due to the ridiculous defense surrounding them. So a fight against those Jinchuriki will never be anything but a full scale attack. Not like it is a problem for me, but hey, maybe some other people want Jinchuriki too.

Maybe other people should put more thought into obtaining bijuu beyond simply locating, extracting it out from a jinchuuriki?

Also the rules said they could post in a public zone and just wait a full day and go back. If no one decides to respond to them being there then they go back. If you look it doesn't have to be a different village, it can be a zone also.

I brought this up because mostly the Kiri nin are the ones who just sit. Dart does rp, I'll give him that, but Isa and Xia don't do anything. These rules are made to follow, not toss aside.

A zone's perfectly fine, though another village would be more favorable as there'd likely be others present who aren't particularly fond of bijuu hunters (and there being safeguards in place).

The fact that the rules aren't being followed by those who've acknowledged them at some point is unacceptable though, and as a result those who haven't followed them should be stripped of their prize and given to somebody else in their clan (or have some event hosted to determine who receives it).