Shinobi Legends Forum

Roleplay => All That Is Bijuu => Council => Topic started by: Ѕhadow on January 03, 2017, 11:13:18 AM

Title: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Ѕhadow on January 03, 2017, 11:13:18 AM
This is to strip Haschwelthe of the 0 tails. He's gone past the inactivity clause and hasn't been logged in for 15 days. I wish to take the bijuu into my possession.
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Trev on January 03, 2017, 07:07:22 PM
Sure, he should be stripped. But why should it go to you? Did you challenge him? I know he doesn't have a forum thread. So if you messaged him a challenge and can prove it, sure it should go to you.
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Ѕhadow on January 03, 2017, 08:12:45 PM
Sure, he should be stripped. But why should it go to you? Did you challenge him? I know he doesn't have a forum thread. So if you messaged him a challenge and can prove it, sure it should go to you.

Challenged him for it on the public thread Eric made for the 0 tails. I waited for him to become inactive to make this topic and even waited an extra day.
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Dart Terumī on January 03, 2017, 08:34:47 PM
I agree to the strip.

However, I don't agree that it immediately goes to Shadow. Hashwelte is already out of compliance in the bijū rules for not having a forum account and not making a preference listing.


Sure, he should be stripped. But why should it go to you? Did you challenge him? I know he doesn't have a forum thread. So if you messaged him a challenge and can prove it, sure it should go to you.

Unless you do have proof that you issued a challenge before posting on the thread that is out of compliance.



If anything, it should be returned to the Council where we will have another Face-Off for it if more than one party is interested in it.

(I would be interested in fighting for it, is what I'm saying. >.<)
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Ѕhadow on January 03, 2017, 10:00:27 PM
Why wouldn't it go to me? Pretty sure if I said nothing it would go into oblivion for another week at the least without anyone saying a word. I waited the recommended amount of time before bringing it to the council and now you're telling me no because others want to have it?
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Hazama on January 03, 2017, 10:09:54 PM
I agree to the strip.

However, I don't agree that it immediately goes to Shadow. Hashwelte is already out of compliance in the bijū rules for not having a forum account and not making a preference listing.


Sure, he should be stripped. But why should it go to you? Did you challenge him? I know he doesn't have a forum thread. So if you messaged him a challenge and can prove it, sure it should go to you.

Unless you do have proof that you issued a challenge before posting on the thread that is out of compliance.



If anything, it should be returned to the Council where we will have another Face-Off for it if more than one party is interested in it.

(I would be interested in fighting for it, is what I'm saying. >.<)

Well seeing as I challenged Ryoji and Yujo for their beasts and stripped them in the same exact manner, essentialy, that I did. And neither of them had preferences put up or anything of the sort O_O

And no one, not from the council, to the onlookers, or from the people I stripped, argued anything about how I did it. And I got all, what, like three/four beasts? o.o Without a single complaint.

Except the Eight Tails, but because Trev and Yujo had been talking or something. But that's okay cause Trev and I handled things like big boys CD

This is the same thing just for the Zero Tails, who has no challengers.
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Hazama on January 03, 2017, 10:25:53 PM
(I would be interested in fighting for it, is what I'm saying. >.<)

Though I won't lie, it would be pretty awesome to see Ben fight again in general.

Love you Ben <3
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Trev on January 04, 2017, 12:15:50 AM
Sure, he should be stripped. But why should it go to you? Did you challenge him? I know he doesn't have a forum thread. So if you messaged him a challenge and can prove it, sure it should go to you.



Didn't you not challenge him till after this thread was made >.>

At least according to forum time. You kinda did it backwards if that's the case.

Challenged him for it on the public thread Eric made for the 0 tails. I waited for him to become inactive to make this topic and even waited an extra day.

Also Dato, if you have an interest in seeing where the Reibi goes you should probably abstain from voting. With Shadow also not getting a vote, there are on odd number of votes left, so it should work out.
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Ace on January 04, 2017, 12:22:55 AM
Strip, and with the information presented, I am inclined to vote also in favor of allowing 0 tails to be in Shadow's possession.

I vote Yes for both measures.
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: JayJay on January 04, 2017, 03:35:53 AM
I mean, if Ace said it >.>
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Hazama on January 04, 2017, 03:38:57 AM
I mean, if Ace said it >.>

I know I didn't make council but....

+1/Amen to that
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Camel on January 04, 2017, 04:17:05 AM
Hate to be a spoiled sport here, but I actually challenged for the Zero-Tails on my alt, Guruguru. The thing is I never received a response back from the host and according to the timeline between me and Shadow, I have the upper-hand since I challenge for it a while back.

Quote
Mail 1 (http://i.imgur.com/wKugTRF.jpg)
Mail 2 (Mail was never read) (http://i.imgur.com/jzyUJER.jpg)
Proof of my identity (http://i.imgur.com/Yz6ZS2e.jpg)

So I don't know how you want to go from here, now that I revealed this information.
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Ace on January 04, 2017, 04:21:16 AM
Well, in-light of new information...

For now, I will remove my vote. <.<
Look like a discussion will be had before we actually have an official vote.
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: JayJay on January 04, 2017, 04:31:27 AM
Hate to be a spoiled sport here, but I actually challenged for the Zero-Tails on my alt, Guruguru. The thing is I never received a response back from the host and according to the timeline between me and Shadow, I have the upper-hand since I challenge for it a while back.

Quote
Mail 1 (http://i.imgur.com/wKugTRF.jpg)
Mail 2 (Mail was never read) (http://i.imgur.com/jzyUJER.jpg)
Proof of my identity (http://i.imgur.com/Yz6ZS2e.jpg)

So I don't know how you want to go from here, now that I revealed this information.

Well, that changes everything!! Sorry Ace. I let you down!! I SOILED THE GOOD NAME OF ACE!!! SOILED IT! SOILED IT! SOILED IT! SOILED IT! SOILED IT! #SorryShadowSenpai!!
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Dart Terumī on January 04, 2017, 11:22:57 AM
Can a mod (Not Kamui for obvious reasons) check out the current mails in Haschwelte's inbox? That'll be the real determining factor.

But, with the new evidence provided...
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Ѕhadow on January 04, 2017, 11:41:23 AM
I could continue to argue towards my own end, but I really don't care about it that much to make a big fuss. I'll be your first challenger once you're all set. It'll be white vs black zetsu. <3
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Eric on January 04, 2017, 01:33:12 PM
Can a mod (Not Kamui for obvious reasons) check out the current mails in Haschwelte's inbox? That'll be the real determining factor.

But, with the new evidence provided...

Wait, are you asking a SL mod to check the personal mailbox of a player despite said player having not violated any game rules? That doesn't seem just a bit shady to you?
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Ace on January 04, 2017, 06:48:36 PM
No mails will be checked. Only if rules are broken or if credible suspicion suggests rules have been broken.  ;)
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Dart Terumī on January 04, 2017, 07:58:30 PM
Can a mod (Not Kamui for obvious reasons) check out the current mails in Haschwelte's inbox? That'll be the real determining factor.

But, with the new evidence provided...

Wait, are you asking a SL mod to check the personal mailbox of a player despite said player having not violated any game rules? That doesn't seem just a bit shady to you?

I thought it was part of their job description to do that?

No mails will be checked. Only if rules are broken or if credible suspicion suggests rules have been broken.  ;)

I did not know that there had to be reasonable cause to get checked out.


If that's the case, then I have some formal complaining to do about invasion of mah privacy! >.<
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Hazama on January 04, 2017, 08:33:56 PM
Can a mod (Not Kamui for obvious reasons) check out the current mails in Haschwelte's inbox? That'll be the real determining factor.

But, with the new evidence provided...

Wait, are you asking a SL mod to check the personal mailbox of a player despite said player having not violated any game rules? That doesn't seem just a bit shady to you?

I thought it was part of their job description to do that?

No mails will be checked. Only if rules are broken or if credible suspicion suggests rules have been broken.  ;)

I did not know that there had to be reasonable cause to get checked out.


If that's the case, then I have some formal complaining to do about invasion of mah privacy! >.<

Seriously >>
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Eric on January 04, 2017, 10:04:06 PM
Can a mod (Not Kamui for obvious reasons) check out the current mails in Haschwelte's inbox? That'll be the real determining factor.

But, with the new evidence provided...

Wait, are you asking a SL mod to check the personal mailbox of a player despite said player having not violated any game rules? That doesn't seem just a bit shady to you?

I thought it was part of their job description to do that?


Going into clan halls without probable cause yes, but through PM's is where the thick line cyan be drawn.
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Ace on January 05, 2017, 12:16:54 AM
So, let's quickly vote on if a strip must occur or not.
Then we can vote on who gets the bijuu. Two separate issues.

I vote Yes, to the strip.
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Ѕhadow on January 05, 2017, 12:20:31 AM
I vote yes. I've already agreed to give it to Kamui and challenge him for it in the coming weeks so my vote should still count.
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Trev on January 05, 2017, 12:20:54 AM
Yes
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Camel on January 05, 2017, 12:35:29 AM
Yes. (I'll have a preference for Guruguru up, after this vote is over with.)
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: KayentaMoenkopi on January 07, 2017, 11:06:43 AM
yes...strip, give to Kamui


and guys? Shadow ...Kamui...why are you voting? conflict of interest!

Athos, why are you voting? what did you have to do with this at all?

And...privacy? Well, its mine so there...However, I also trust the ethics of those with the power to look into my pms to stay out of them unless a complaint has been made and there is evidence to warrant an invasion/investigation. And of course Bijuu things have nothing to do with a valid rule violation.

Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Hades on January 07, 2017, 10:27:24 PM
Yes, give to Kamui.
Title: Re: Bijuu council, Docket #2, case for stripping, Haschwelthe | 0 tails
Post by: Ѕhadow on January 13, 2017, 08:30:59 PM
Locking thread. Vote is yes.

Beast goes to Kamui's alt Guruguru. (Please let it be known if you pull a Genesis and switch the host <3)