106
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: July 28, 2012, 12:11:33 PM »
Basks in his sheriffness. >>
Shinobi Legends Forum - Shinobi Legends Game Site
- June 26, 2024, 05:42:09 AM
- Welcome, Guest
News:
New members: you need admin approval, please petition *in game* if you made an account. 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
107
Village Square / Enough is just that, ENOUGH!
« on: July 28, 2012, 11:59:03 AM »
Most of you are familiar with Bocc's pirated six path rinnegan and the pros and cons. I stand somewhere between, I agree with most of the arguments situated on each side.
This has gotten more complaints than anything in the history of Shinobi Legends, be it Tobi intangibility, instantaneous replacements, magic clones, etc. It is more than clear that something like that should be dealt with, and when I say dealt with I mean treated in the same manner. At this point it doesn't matter who is right and who is not. If doton was protested in regards to by 99% of SL it was to be voided. I mean more than enough people pestered me about hot it should be illegitimate etc. for me to realize this is turning in to a grave issue of sorts.
The main purpose of this post was for me to make my standing point known.
This has gotten more complaints than anything in the history of Shinobi Legends, be it Tobi intangibility, instantaneous replacements, magic clones, etc. It is more than clear that something like that should be dealt with, and when I say dealt with I mean treated in the same manner. At this point it doesn't matter who is right and who is not. If doton was protested in regards to by 99% of SL it was to be voided. I mean more than enough people pestered me about hot it should be illegitimate etc. for me to realize this is turning in to a grave issue of sorts.
The main purpose of this post was for me to make my standing point known.
108
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: July 28, 2012, 10:00:30 AM »
Anyway, I'm not shocked in the least, it's not the first time Kam violates said privacy rules.
109
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: July 28, 2012, 09:56:50 AM »
I own Raifudo, Zenaku, Kayenta, Asadi, Kamui, Bocc, Cmage and 10 other people from that list. >>
110
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: July 28, 2012, 08:00:30 AM »Message to possible participants:
Hello:
Well we are trying this bijuu council thing again.
Please reply and indicate if you are interested in serving on the forum. If you do not reply soon then we will assume you don't wish to help out or are too inactive to be a useful member. Of course if your activity level should increase in the future you can drop by and see about participating then.
We have a few rules we are trying to revise. Mostly about how long inactive hosts and or Kage's responsible for the bijuu have until the council has to step in to place the bijuu.
And then we have an inactive host that is under discussion and would appreciate your input on what to do if anything.
the link is as follows:
http://forum.shinobilegends.com/index.php/topic,6929.150.html
The people being contacted are the following 19 people:
Zenaku
Raifudo
Uchiha, Rares
Asadi
Yūmei
Cmage/Rakudo
Kamui
Nathan
Uchiha_Tracey
CJ of The Desert
Kayenta Moenkopi
Raishin
Isaribi
Luka
Solo
Raijin
Izaku Raiken
ShadowX
Bocchiere
~Moenkopi
I was not contacted! I feel left out! ;~;
I'll start by voting on my day limit suggestion:
3 days.
111
Feature Requests / Re: Newer Mounts (Shippuden)
« on: July 28, 2012, 06:52:37 AM »
I'm not wasting gems on such a mount. >>; He is far too uncute. <<;
112
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: July 28, 2012, 06:50:37 AM »
I did my fair share of advertisement back when such was required for the poll. I didn't now merely because I'd find it hypocritical for me to go pm this to others I disapprove of.
Not to insult them or anything but I am fairly certain that a few of those would be deemed as unworthy by quite a few.
First thing is first, we need to decide on an optimal way to function before anything is done.
So before we start, I suggest we vote on the following:
How many days should there pass for the voting on a rule to be closed:
3
7
10
14
unlimited - I personally think it is a drag to require half + 1 votes out of the total when not all members actually got to vote, we could end up stalled for weeks if not months.
I believe the numbers I have offered are fairly close to each other, I am not opting for a put in your number kind of vote due to the sheer fact that we could end up with one number/person.
There are 3-4 I'd personally want kicked out out of worldly reasons but I'm tired of having my judgement and lack of corruption questioned so I'll leave that be for the time being.
I'd personally like to suggest that the voting on this be closed in a week given that we deemed all of them as active and notified.
Lastly, I'd suggest updating the member list on the first page if such was not done already.
Not to insult them or anything but I am fairly certain that a few of those would be deemed as unworthy by quite a few.
First thing is first, we need to decide on an optimal way to function before anything is done.
So before we start, I suggest we vote on the following:
How many days should there pass for the voting on a rule to be closed:
3
7
10
14
unlimited - I personally think it is a drag to require half + 1 votes out of the total when not all members actually got to vote, we could end up stalled for weeks if not months.
I believe the numbers I have offered are fairly close to each other, I am not opting for a put in your number kind of vote due to the sheer fact that we could end up with one number/person.
There are 3-4 I'd personally want kicked out out of worldly reasons but I'm tired of having my judgement and lack of corruption questioned so I'll leave that be for the time being.
I'd personally like to suggest that the voting on this be closed in a week given that we deemed all of them as active and notified.
Lastly, I'd suggest updating the member list on the first page if such was not done already.
113
Village Square / Re: War Events
« on: July 28, 2012, 01:48:29 AM »
That edit made me lol.... LITERALLY. xD
114
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: July 28, 2012, 01:17:20 AM »
Now, now, who would be best suited to do such if not the GM? Go do it yourself. >_> I'm no mailman. You're the one that has created this thread and has mod power over it.
If you're a council member then freaking check this thread once in a while.
I'm guessing that setting a short day limit could work as a solution, it would be silly to stall ourselves by days/weeks/months just cause others are inactive. The day limit I would suggest is 3-7 days. I think setting this date should be our priority.
Given that to my understanding all these supposed council members were asked if they will to be such, the least they could do is check this thread every once in a while. Should be their responsibility.
Not to insult or anything... but your hypocrisy stuns me a little. You refused to as much as take part in that pool but here you are standing more than strongly.
Alas, at the very least, I'd strongly recommend a reshape of that old council in the sense of removing the following:
Known alts, others known to express their will to not be such(Pete is one if I recall correctly) and those refusing to contribute. There is no point in being a member if you won't act like one.
If you're a council member then freaking check this thread once in a while.
I'm guessing that setting a short day limit could work as a solution, it would be silly to stall ourselves by days/weeks/months just cause others are inactive. The day limit I would suggest is 3-7 days. I think setting this date should be our priority.
Given that to my understanding all these supposed council members were asked if they will to be such, the least they could do is check this thread every once in a while. Should be their responsibility.
Not to insult or anything... but your hypocrisy stuns me a little. You refused to as much as take part in that pool but here you are standing more than strongly.
Alas, at the very least, I'd strongly recommend a reshape of that old council in the sense of removing the following:
Known alts, others known to express their will to not be such(Pete is one if I recall correctly) and those refusing to contribute. There is no point in being a member if you won't act like one.
115
Village Square / Re: all thouse other rases
« on: July 27, 2012, 09:57:30 PM »
Well that's fairly mature of you two. >>
116
Spam / Re: Zojin Graphics: One Stop Graphics Shop
« on: July 27, 2012, 07:57:56 PM »
Then go open the pm and stuff. <<;
118
Bugreports / Re: Otogakure - Otogakure
« on: July 27, 2012, 07:34:38 PM »
I blame this on Trev. >>
119
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: July 27, 2012, 07:29:27 PM »
While there were various other errors such as same ip votes and same ip candidates, most, if not all were generated by the fact that quite a few were leveling for others at that point. However, I was assured by Ace that I'd be one of those that would have still made it, and I trust at least other 3-4 from that list are unquestionably in the same case. Needless to say that the reason for which this fell down is that Ace spotted same IP among the top 9 and could not reveal who it was, but honestly, everyone that knows the particular 9 would most likely certify that there is no way they are the same person, 2 exceptions... MAYBE.
I personally think that the need for a 5-9 members council is of dire need, I hoped things would go smoothly without such given that the idea seemed to be horribly revolting and what not, me being less eligible than Bocc, Athos, Solo, Trev and the alike. <.<; I never get tired of that one. xD
But yeah, bottom line, if this village stripping topic showed us anything, it's that we do have a need for such in order to decide properly rather than "If Kay agrees it goes, if not, the idea can go make love to itself." Not bashing or anything of the sort, just saying it doesn't seem like an exactly fair procedure.
Edit: Note that the Kay part was merely due to quite a few supposed council members are inactive on SL, a lot more on here.
This council is obviously bound to meet complications due to both the ridiculously high number of members and the inactive. I'm not demanding that the last poll be appointed as the ultimate bijuu council, it is one of the multiple solutions just. I'm simply saying that SOMETHING needs to be done about this.
I personally think that the need for a 5-9 members council is of dire need, I hoped things would go smoothly without such given that the idea seemed to be horribly revolting and what not, me being less eligible than Bocc, Athos, Solo, Trev and the alike. <.<; I never get tired of that one. xD
But yeah, bottom line, if this village stripping topic showed us anything, it's that we do have a need for such in order to decide properly rather than "If Kay agrees it goes, if not, the idea can go make love to itself." Not bashing or anything of the sort, just saying it doesn't seem like an exactly fair procedure.
Edit: Note that the Kay part was merely due to quite a few supposed council members are inactive on SL, a lot more on here.
This council is obviously bound to meet complications due to both the ridiculously high number of members and the inactive. I'm not demanding that the last poll be appointed as the ultimate bijuu council, it is one of the multiple solutions just. I'm simply saying that SOMETHING needs to be done about this.
120
Village Square / Re: Bijuu Council and Discussion
« on: July 27, 2012, 07:14:06 PM »
You need to understand the case in which such would be done is an exceptional one. I mean, with no such rules, they could be a lousy as they please and just keep having an inactive jinchuriki after the other and so on.
The fact that under inactivity cases the bijuu will simply go to the kage, is, I believe, more than enough favoritism for the villages.
The mere thought of a village not undergoing proper punishment for high scale incompetence is truly revolting.
The fact that under inactivity cases the bijuu will simply go to the kage, is, I believe, more than enough favoritism for the villages.
The mere thought of a village not undergoing proper punishment for high scale incompetence is truly revolting.