Shinobi Legends Forum - Shinobi Legends Game Site

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Ever wondered if your ideas have been talked about in the forum already? Well, try out the "search" option, where all your questions can be answered.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Hades

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
31
Council / Re: [Bijuu Council] Agenda #3 - All of the things
« on: September 25, 2016, 06:15:31 AM »
I also would say continue to allow them to choose their own judges.

And also, yes. (Technically 11 posts per person)

32
Council / Re: Future Council Structure [Discussion]
« on: September 22, 2016, 02:55:08 PM »
Agreeing with Trev, I don't really think anything is wrong with the council. I do think suitable replacements should be found for Eric and Silver, as they have sadly been unresponsive.

I think due to the typical preference to have GMs step in and RP as beasts when necessary, I'd like to avoid having GMs on the council as I think it is a conflict of interest. I think the council should consist of people very much concerned with helping things better for other players and very much not concerned with possessing or helping friends possess beasts in any way.

Also agreeing with Chinote, I'd just like to have a little more structure. Particularly with dual topics created specifically and at the same time, so that we can see community comments about beast issues but deliberate between the group of us in a more cohesive string that is not broken up by the persuasive, logical arguments the other community members would like to present for our consideration.

33
Council / Re: [Bijuu Council] Agenda #3 - All of the things
« on: September 22, 2016, 12:55:54 AM »
My apologies for missing some of this earlier.

As a result of our proposed challenge system being inclusive of any players desiring to possess a beast, I vote that we do not need to take any special action for previous standing challenges.

As multiple beast hosting is permitted, I vote in favor of allowing Trev to enter his name.

I do not have a problem with players/alts hosting beasts because they are existing characters. NPCs should be not be used.

I think that's everything I missed.

34
Council / Re: [Bijuu Council] Agenda #3 - All of the things
« on: September 21, 2016, 08:50:32 AM »
If people are going to fight each other for a biju, give two set rules to speed it up. Reduce the time between responses from 7 days to 5 or 3. Also give them 2-3 pages on the forum max. Then a judge decided the winner based on how the fight was going, etc. That way you have expedited posting, and also a page limit so the fight doesn't go on forever.

If people would prefer the multiple challengers per Bijuu option, and if it gets implemented, then we will look into ways to expedite the process. There's no reason not to have each Bijuu either sealed or in combat in 3-4 weeks. (6 more days for Eric to vote, Silver if he's around, a week challenge period, then the actual RP.)


It appears that support for Kay's idea is growing, so;

COUNCIL ONLY:
The 0-3, 5-9 Tails will be distributed as follows:
A 1 Week Open challenge period in which case anyone may challenge ONE Bijuu of their choice.
Challengers who challenge for the same Bijuu will fight each other (1v1, tournament style if applicable [rules tbd]) and the winner will be awarded the Bijuu.
Challengers who's Bijuu does not receive another challenge will face the Bijuu (GMs tbd) in 1v1 combat. They must defeat, seal, or otherwise incapacitate the Bijuu to be declared successful and obtain control of the Bijuu.
Bijuu who do not receive a challenge in the one-week time period will be set to roaming. They may be hunted and challenged by any individual, group, village, etc.
Bijuu who's challengers fail to capture them will be set to roaming as per above.

Yay or Nay.


My vote's still Yay.


I also vote in favor of this.

35
Council / Re: [Bijuu Council] Agenda #3 - All of the things
« on: September 19, 2016, 10:06:26 PM »
I certainly like the plan. So that's three of us... I lost track of council membership honestly. Who else are we waiting to hear from?

36
Council / Re: [Bijuu Council] Agenda #3 - All of the things
« on: September 19, 2016, 09:56:47 PM »
In that case I agree as well. Although I think we will receive complaints about limiting people to one challenge. Clearly, as Athos and Madara proved, the immediate interest is for all beasts, not specific ones.

37
Council / Re: [Bijuu Council] Agenda #3 - All of the things
« on: September 19, 2016, 09:47:36 PM »
Shouldn't we be honoring other standing challenges like Trev's? Or were there honestly no others?

38
Rules/Foundation / Re: The Stripped Bijuu [vote]
« on: August 04, 2016, 04:27:33 AM »
Looks good.

39
Rules/Foundation / Re: Stripping a Host Clause [vote/notification]
« on: August 04, 2016, 04:27:11 AM »
Looks good.

40
Council / Re: [Biju Council] Agenda #2: Gedo Mazo
« on: July 13, 2016, 01:41:53 AM »
I would say let's have another GM fight.

Genesis is now absent for SL indefinitely, I believe, so we may have a new council seat to fill soon.

41
Council / Re: [Biju Council] Agenda #2: Gedo Mazo
« on: July 02, 2016, 03:06:18 AM »
I would absolutely love to see Raifudo RP again.

42
Council / Re: [Biju Council] Agenda #2: Gedo Mazo
« on: June 28, 2016, 08:54:19 AM »
As it has already been voted, we treat the Mazo as a beast. The challenge was made and overlooked, so we move on from there. A fight would be interesting, though I find myself indifferent as to whether it's necessary.

43
Naruto / Re: Madara's Storm Release
« on: June 14, 2016, 06:07:03 AM »
But, every Rinnegan user DOES have the ability to master all of the 5 basic elements, meaning that they likely have the ability to perform all of the combinations between the elements as well. Combine that with Madara's sharingan likely having seen a storm release jutsu done before, and I think it is entirely a Rinnegan deal that gave him usage of storm release.

I'm with Eric on this one.

44
Council / Re: [Discussion]: Council Member Inactivity
« on: June 12, 2016, 04:30:30 AM »
I just want to put this out there, partly because it is a situation I'll somewhat be in?

How do we want to treat vacations?

The week of the 20th-24th I will be on vacation. There is a strong possibility I'll still be able to log in, and I'll definitely make a concerted effort if there are any council decisions to be made, but there is a possibility of my being inactive for 7 days.

45
Council / Re: [Biju Council] Agenda #1: Hosting of the Zero Tails
« on: June 08, 2016, 01:41:23 AM »
It is unanimous, I also agree that Ryoji should forfeit/be stripped.

Bocchiere should either participate in a GMed battle or be given the reibi.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.