Shinobi Legends Forum - Shinobi Legends Game Site

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New members: you need admin approval, please petition *in game* if you made an account. :)

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - UettoSenju

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 78
1
Add me to the challenger list.

2
Spam / Re: Contact outside SL
« on: October 03, 2017, 07:31:09 AM »
Will bath in the picks of male genitalia he receives.

3
Spam / Re: Contact outside SL
« on: September 23, 2017, 07:01:26 AM »
Confesses at last to prank calling Kirk for about a month now...

it was a fad.

but a fun one!

I honestly never noticed a strange number calling me....

Send nudes though. (Not you Asadi)

4
Spam / Re: SL Hokage Tier List
« on: September 23, 2017, 06:55:37 AM »
When you're just a lonely Hokage elect...

5
Spam / Re: Hokage tier list
« on: September 23, 2017, 06:53:39 AM »
It was once stated the 3rd in his prime was perhaps the strongest wasn't it? Plus he had mastered more things than any other I do believe and had knowledge of all things to a greater scale.

I mean hell even in his old age he went toe to toe with Oro who could have beat both Pervy Sage and Lady Hokage easily in my opinion. This being when he was but a fraction of his old self. The guy had mastered chakra control to such an amazing degree.

I honestly think he was over looked as a character power house later in the series when he became irrelevant to the plot.

If anything he got plot nerfed.

6
Spam / Re: Idle Game Too Strong
« on: July 30, 2017, 04:30:16 AM »
You know what? I'm coming back for my spot at the top 3.

o.O I summoned the dead.

brains...

7
I'm not even sure if I'm on the claims list for the stuff I have... yet no one ever questions anything.

8
Rules/Foundation / Re: Limiting Bijuu Ownership (Vote)
« on: May 03, 2017, 03:44:35 AM »
Yay

9
Rules/Foundation / Re: Limiting Bijuu Ownership (Discussion)
« on: May 01, 2017, 05:35:56 AM »
It'd be cool to be exempt from the rules, still at work currently. I mean, this rule xD

@Gyu
I work Thursday through Sunday >> Yeah I haven't replied yet, I dun wanna during work times.

@Kamui
Soon as in soon, like I've said(I know you've missed it though, so don't worry), I wanted the redistribution to go hand in hand with the IC Rules. If I can't get that, then rejoice in the fact that I have ready handed out one of the Beasts that I had o.o To someone who can do the Bijuu game good.

@Kirk
I love you, but come at me, bro.

^obviously a joke and a pun on us being brothers xD

Nice pun but I have no desire to fight anyone for a tailed nor to host one.

10
Rules/Foundation / Re: Limiting Bijuu Ownership (Discussion)
« on: May 01, 2017, 05:02:38 AM »
I really haven't seen the biggest reason as to why tailed beast farming is a bad thing so I'll state it here. It seems people are to busy saying oh me, me, me instead of debating cons and pros like a discussion like this should be done.

No offense Athos but come at me bro isn't a legit pro or con to the issue at hand.

So anyways, the biggest issue with farming the beast is if a host has an abundance of the beast and goes inactive, quits, or gets banned all those beast get tied up in a limbo until the issue can be handled. I'm aware Athos you could say (I use you as an example because you are the current main beast farmer) "I am active i want go inactive." but anything could happen. God forbid but who knows you could croak in rl.

If the beast are held in a 1:1 or 2:1 ration at max it leaves less sorting out to do. The beast can easily be passed on to the next challenger in line and they inherit the challenger list or something.

11
Rules/Foundation / Re: Limiting Bijuu Ownership (Discussion)
« on: April 30, 2017, 09:33:07 AM »
Please pardon me for not knowing, as you all should already know, I haven't been around the forum for quite awhile and missed out on a lot of stuff. I see pseudo Jinchuuriki the same way I see players with EMS, Rinnegan or a combo of both, so I don't really see how having a few Kinkaku & Ginkaku running around can be any worst than seeing Pain & Madara everywhere.

But I am not going to make a thread to try and overturn the decision to not allow non-host to have Bijuu chakra. I'll respect that decision regardless of my own opinion.

I stick with the argument on my opening post, I see no benefit in letting a single player hold onto multiple Bijuu indefinitely, only how it takes Bijuu out of RP, and the danger of someone creating any army of zombie Jinchuuriki. Yes, no Jinchuuriki is going to bother challenging other host/summoner for their Bijuu, but this will not kill Bijuu RP because others are going to want to take that Bijuu away from its current host. Not to mention that Athos is probably not using every Bijuu that he is currently holding. And even if he is, they are probably nothing more than giant beasts that he summons onto the battlefield. Compare that kind of RP to having a player mature with his Bijuu and RP its personality.

Do you guys know how the 1st official list of Jinchuuriki was born? If you want a Bijuu, you post a short RP involving said tailed-beast. The person who does it the best was chosen as the official host. What have Athos done with the Bijuu lately?

If a time limit that gets shorter the more Bijuu you have is unacceptable, then I stand firmly on having a hard limit of 1 Bijuu per player.

Soo... You're basically admitting you started this topic with me specifically in mind and not actually changing the rules? >> Didn't like looking at me from all the way down there, while I sit on my 'throne' made of collected Bijuu?

Actually, if you want to get technical, Gyu. You remember how the first bijuu list was actually made? .-. Raifudo got sick of everyone running around and claiming ten-twenty Nine Tails and then went around and cleared things up >_> How would I know? Because I had a friend who was one of those BS Nine Tails users, Naruto Uzumaki, and I remember when he said something about the Bijuu and was essentially told 'Nah, this is how it's working, screw you scrub.' That being said, maybe things happened differently at the very beginning but it was legit right back to hunting and killing people for their beasts.

Like, things weren't great with the beasts back then but what made it work was that not everyone was just Madara or Naruto with a bunch of OP shit. Back then, we were all, like, Jounin-level and having a Bijuu actually made a difference. Back before everyone had infinite chakra and could move faster than the speed of light. I've learned the hard way, from myself and Eric doing it all the time, that mentioning the old days does nothing but confuse people >_> Things worked differently back then because things WERE different back then.

So, bite me.

Things were better back then for sure. But I'll reframe from bringing up stories the pages of history themselves long forgot.

And to be fair Uzu I don't think one can speak on the issue at hand without referring to you in some fashion. I mean come on bro you are currently farming the beast aren't you?

You gotta look at it from the other way in as well man. Yes I am tailed beast farming so yes anything said here would apply to me and yes my name will be brought up because I am the one doing it.

Just because you happen to be the one doing it and people have opinions about it is no reason to get salty my friend. If anything you should be like yeah use me as an example because I am an example in this case.

You know if we started to look at these types of debates in that manner we would see a lot more progress at the site rp wise. Instead of this oh I'm get offended someone doesn't share my opinion bull crap.

You're acting like a true millinial bro. We can have a civil debate here.

It's like a court hearing man. You are the one being accused cause you are the one guilty of the issue at hand. I mean nothing can be done about it so just accept it and plead you innocence.

Back to the matter at hand. What benefits to rp come from one person having more than one tailed beast? Athos?, I'm calling you out here cause as a tailed beast famer you should have a pretty good answer to the question along with a better understanding of the benefits.

12
Rules/Foundation / Re: Limiting Bijuu Ownership (Discussion)
« on: April 30, 2017, 08:26:07 AM »
*walks in with his life alert necklace use his cane to do so being the old vet he is*

I haven't noted a post from Kay or Kamui... this place isn't the same anymore......

Anyways, my opinion probably doesn't matter much cause I'm just a figure of the past at this point. I don't really care about Tailed Beast anymore nor plan to go after one or even evolve myself with them rp wise.

However, I am a member of the site and get a voice so I'll use it. This all being cause I'm just an old stubborn dick head who likes to pop in from time to time.

I have always been against tailed beast farming. To me it kills rp. I always base my opinion on what I think is best for rp. Not who I am friends with or like or hate or blah blah. I say that cause Uzu should know he is a close friend of mine and I'm not 'out to get him'.

Regardless, it has always been ideal to me to limit 1 beast to a host. But realistically speaking I'd go with 2 no more than 3 though. I don't understand why someone would want more than one to be honest.

Even though I formed the senju scroll to seal them all in tonturn the senju grand tree into a super power monster at SL before there was ever a thought of a 10 tails or tree in the manga. I never did it cause it didn't feel right. Just my thoughts though.

It is also weird that half the custom stuff I invented become cannon in the manga years later. I think Kishi used my creations to help construct his manga to bad I didn't have copy rights.

Also can it be confirmed now that I am the eldest still active rper at SL? Just wondering.

13
Spam / Re: Argumentation
« on: March 06, 2017, 02:44:56 AM »
I wish we could just fight our disagreements out in RL. It'd make thing so much easier. Just beat the hell out of each other.

You will always have that guy (or gal) to bring a gun to a fistfight or a knife to a fistfight. Nah, if you think people are backtabby now, translating these issues to RL... *shivers*.


Because the irritating part about the arguments is that most of them are blatantly fallacious. By arguments, I mean the formal process of presenting a sound and valid argument. Not shouting at each other and having pissing contests.

Well, if the (presidential, important to be clear) Election is anything to go by, presenting sound and valid arguments is less important than convincing the deciders. I could argue that the sky is blue, and thus air is blue, and if my goal is to convince some kids that the air is actually blue, then a sound and valid argument is hardly needed if they are convinced of it.

Similiary, you don't have to be absolutely correct, objectively speaking, to win a decision in a biju match. You just gotta convince the judge(s) and/or Council members of your cause. Sure it helps to be right, but being convincing is more important in this setting.

Oh cool they even have a word for what people would actually use this for.

Fallacy-dropping
“”What we have here is a blatant example of argument by assertion (http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_by_assertion). It's therefore clear your mother was a whore, and you flunked out of elementary school.
—Colonel Custer[10]
It is not acceptable to merely state that one's opponent is using a fallacy (as above). One must explain how the opponent's argument is fallacious (eg, they claim that you are a shill), why it is wrong (there's no evidence that you are a paid government disinformation agent), and what that means for their argument (if you're not a shill, then your arguments can't be hand waved away) [11].
This need not be a drawn-out paragraph. Even "your ad hominem is irrelevant to my argument, so my argument stands" is sufficient.
Otherwise, one runs into the risk of fallacy dropping -- claiming someone's argument is wrong without bothering to explain why -- which comes dangerously close to ad hominem. (It's equivalent to shouting "your logic is bad!" and claiming victory.)

That's what I imagine the majority would be just copy and pasting words from this page as to why someone is wrong without actually understanding them.

Lol.

Bullets fly both ways. Lol.

14
Spam / Re: Argumentation
« on: March 03, 2017, 03:39:56 PM »
I wish we could just fight our disagreements out in RL. It'd make thing so much easier. Just beat the hell out of each other.

15
Spam / Re: Contact outside SL
« on: February 28, 2017, 06:36:42 AM »
I'm sure about 90% of the people who visit the forums won't be malicious with your phone....but perhaps you shouldn't post it in the open for everyone to see. This forum isn't private. >>

I honestly don't care that much. Lol.

I aware it is public but I've never really been that worried about it.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 78

Page created in 0.163 seconds with 34 queries.