We. well at least I post some kind of evidence when I state most thing unless I'm jerking around, however I have yet to see one bit of 'Proof' from you. You only provide things that aren't proven themselves also, your as bad as everyone else mate, sorry.
~blinks.
Theories that you guys made up:
1. Danzo = Izuna: I proved that Izuna is dead with sources from the manga and the databook.
2. Danzo = Obito: I agreed with Jin in regards to the time differences. The time difference is evidence in itself.
Also, I would like to add that Pein would most likely not have been born yet to revive Izuna or Obito.
Reasoning being, that Madara attacked Konoha AFTER taking his brother's eyes. During that 1st attack, 3rd Hokage (same would be true for Danzo) may not have been born or just be a lil child. Based on the pic of 3rd Hokage and Sannins, he looks like at least in his 20s with the Sannins being in their early teens.
Jiraiya was most likely the 1st person to acknowledge Nagato's Rinnegan and he may have been near his late teens or 20s at that point. Too big of a time difference for the meeting.
EDIT: Here's some pics to compare and conclude for yourselves:
-
http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/File:Team_Nindaime.jpg-
http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/File:3sannin.jpg-
http://www.onemanga.com/Naruto/373/13/3. Danzo = Uchiha: I stated how Kakashi has a Sharingan and he's not in Uchiha. For those of you who knows the math proofs. It relates to the A = B, B = C, then A = C thing. So if saying Danzo has a Sharingan he must be an Uchiha. However Kakashi has a Sharingan and he's not an Uchiha. It makes the statement a false statement. In addition to the weird reasoning behind it since if Danzo was really an Uchiha, he would have fought for their rights in governing affairs.
4. Danzo = Tobi: Just by reading it, it doesnt make any sense. Tobi = Madara so how does Tobi = Danzo? Madara is setting up Sasuke to attack/kill himself? I didnt want to waste my time touching that and you posted how that was possible. >.>
Hmmm.... Danzo = Tobi more likely now... however I have had a new theory lately that maybe Danzo is Tobi's little brother, then one whose eyes he stole from.
5. I read something about an eye swap or 1 eye thing:
http://www.onemanga.com/Naruto/399/04/It shows both of his eyes gone and if you think about it, how would a blind man take some1's eyes (let's be reminded that Izuna has MS) by force? He cant even see!
Look at this:
http://www.onemanga.com/Naruto/399/09/It shows Madara's Sharingan in both of his eye sockets, leaving the village. Also that was shown after the image of his dead brother in the casket. I see no reason why Madara would give his own Sharingan to Danzo. If anything Madara should have gave his Sharingan to 3rd Hokage since he was the only one fighting for the Uchiha clan. However that's assuming if he would even do a nice thing like that in the first place.
I dont know how are you going to say that I post things w/o evidence. Did you seriously miss that post where I provided links to support my statements? It's one thing to post "You provided little evidence to support your statements" but to actually say that I provided NONE at all, that just tells me you are blind or something. Please Ice, go think before you post an attack against me next time.
Madara said that... just like he said he didn't attack Konoha with the Kyuubi.
Itachi said he stole them from his Brother.
FYI: Madara did admit he attacked Konoha with Kyuubi.
http://www.onemanga.com/Naruto/399/10-11/http://www.onemanga.com/Naruto/399/14/http://www.onemanga.com/Naruto/399/15/He may be lying about the 2nd attack, could have been another Uchiha, maybe even Danzo himself since he has Sharingan, or maybe just a natural accident like Madara said. However he did admit attacking Konoha w/ the Kyuubi.
Is that enough evidence for you? I dont think you even know what evidence really means. Obviously, I cant find anything in the manga that proves all your statements wrong directly but I can pull sources from the manga that would indirectly prove your statements wrong. Common sense itself could also be part of evidence. For example, some1 claims their neighbor's dog ruined their TV satellite dish. Do you really think something like that is logically possible w/o the dog getting any assistance in this action?
