1. It's 2 weeks of no-notice inactivity. Then it goes to kage.
Even better.
2. Kages cannot assume the role of an active-host in the sense they use the hostless bijuu as their own.
I believe this was covered when I stated "should the defending Kage already have
their own Bijuu sealed within them during the period challenged for the inactive bijuu, they are allowed to use the tails of
their own Bijuu for the duration of the match" =]
Meaning for example, if I am kage with the 2 tails sealed within me, then yes I am able to use my 2 tails to defend myself against a person who challenges me for the formerly inactive 4 tails.
3. That's already set in place. We said if the kage is also inactive for 2 weeks, we distribute it to their village for them.
Who consists of "we"? There is no official council if that is what you are referring to. There is only a hypothetical council
as of now.
4. No need to give the in-actives the incentive of having a rule for themselves. The kage has the right to pass it to whom they desire.
I added this clause as it negates a giant loophole that can otherwise be exploited. Host A goes inactive and has the Bijuu stripped by Kage B. Host A returns soon after their Bijuu was stripped and Kage B returns the Bijuu to them. Host A then again goes inactive for a period of 2 weeks and is stripped again by Kage B. Host A returns yet again right after their Bijuu was stripped and has Kage B return it to them. Rinse and repeat. See where I'm going with this?
If the Bijuu is constantly returned to someone who is systematically inactive, I can see that sprouting many problems. Bijuu need to be given to a person who is
constantly active. Hence this "two strikes" rule.
5. We're not going to punish a village for something they cannot control -- inactivity of certain individuals. The bijuu will go to a host that is self-elected and seen positively or generally-elected by his/her peers and fellow villagers.
Yes, you are definitely correct. No one has control over the actions or inactivity of another. However, what they
do have control over is how quickly and how effectively they react to the situation. Unless I am mistaken about the process of how one becomes Kage, the moment that a village concludes that their current leader is MIA they (or a single person/second in command if that is how they chose a leader) are/is capable of installing a new one to take the old one's place. It even works this way in the manga. As I stated before, this rule can possibly serve to "inspire the village as a whole to elect a new Kage to replace the old one quickly in the instance of inactivity."
What is a village supposed to do in the event of a missing Kage? I highly doubt they are supposed twiddle their thumbs and wait around until the inactive kage happens to return and pick a heir to the throne so to speak.
6. Already established.
Listed simply for clarification.
I'm just, honestly, thinking of calling the elected 9 from the thread to be considered the "council". I don't need the run-around claim of "I hold this title" and "that reason is why", etc. The thread/poll was fairly erected and self-elected; voted by the community as a whole and properly advertised.
I have no say as to who exactly is on the council since, quite frankly, I don't have an opinion on the matter ^ ^;
However, if there is to be any further discussion with the use of "we" and "Bijuu council" as possible beast designators, then I suggest establishing an official and working council first.