Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Balanar]

By giving away your mount, more active players could posibly help newer/less active player advance. At the same time making it harder for "the giver" to advance.

[Youdaime]

Giving away mount is almost like giving away gems. Neji made this option for... stronger shinobi. Guess not a chance for change.

[Neji]

Correct.

It will result in multis who level up and donate their mount to another char to sell it and get gems... then we have a 10 characters played by 1 player and constant transfers...
I won't give myself more work to control those things...

[SharinganBom]

yeah just got a new faster computer and looked at my very very very old topic and saw that everone made fun of me just cause my retarded slow computer couldnt go on this forum site fast enough and i couldnt post alot.
so right now im starting to be more active on this forum and start posting more.

on the mount subject, i think it is a good idea for stronger players to be able to sell there mounts to newer players.

[PyroPrinny]

No, never. It would disrupt the balance...Especially if an ACad could get Pakkun...They have to work to get good mounts.

[Mihamaru]

No, never. It would disrupt the balance...Especially if an ACad could get Pakkun...They have to work to get good mounts.

Hey, let them have Pakkun. He'd be no good for them.

[PyroPrinny]

Well...Still..If they're an ACad...They shouldn't be getting things like Pakkun, Shukaku, or that Slug thing.
The best thing they should be able to get is Kyuubi...If they donate for it...

[LeafToad]

Hey, let them have Pakkun. He'd be no good for them.

Oh yes it would. Level one acad goes into the forest WITH a mount that doubles their attack and defense, they will get enough flawlesses to boost them to level 8.

[Neji]

It will result in multis who level up and donate their mount to another char to sell it and get gems... then we have a 10 characters played by 1 player and constant transfers...
I won't give myself more work to control those things...

[Shiro-chan]

It's a great idea in terms of the thoughts that are going into it, but seems wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too impractical in the long run. Heck, I'd love to have Pakkun *Is Level 11 Blue Jounin*

[Mihamaru]

Hey, let them have Pakkun. He'd be no good for them.

Oh yes it would. Level one acad goes into the forest WITH a mount that doubles their attack and defense, they will get enough flawlesses to boost them to level 8.

I level one acad won't be affected.
0 + 0 = 0, and he's run out before their stats got high enough.

[Lebis]

Hey, let them have Pakkun. He'd be no good for them.

Oh yes it would. Level one acad goes into the forest WITH a mount that doubles their attack and defense, they will get enough flawlesses to boost them to level 8.

I level one acad won't be affected.
0 + 0 = 0, and he's run out before their stats got high enough.

1 + 1 = 2

No character has 0 statistics.

On my student alt, I don't have a mount.. but within the first day I got to level 5 with no weapon or armour. Never left the forest once.

[BugWarrior]

I agree that giving academy students strong mounts would cause multiple problems.  Academy students shouldn't be able to get mounts like Pakkun, katsuya, and Mando.  However, it seems funny that no one has a problem with students getting the power of a kage, but have issues with them getting mounts like sannins and kages. Double standards

[Lebis]

Nobody? Then you didn't include me.

I made a bit deal about a Jounin having Pakkun,

[BugWarrior]

We agree, but I'm making a correlation between academy students gaining sannin power by staying at level 15 and no one have a problem with it. However, when it comes to a academy student getting a mount of a sannin we quickly come to say that this messing up the balance.  It should be both ways.