Shinobi Legends Forum - Shinobi Legends Game Site

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Ever wondered if your ideas have been talked about in the forum already? Well, try out the "search" option, where all your questions can be answered.

Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: Gems transfer through mission HQ  (Read 5245 times)

Gyu~ru~ru

  • Site Staff (Moderator)
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Karma: +327/-317
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Gems transfer through mission HQ
« on: May 12, 2007, 12:55:09 AM »

Just a feature request for those who needs the gems transfer feature back.

The fee for transfering gems is 10 donation points per gem. The minimum amount of gems per transaction is 10 gems and the maximum would be 100 gems per transaction.
Logged

Shukaku

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +155/-150
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2788
  • How can my feet smell if they don't have a nose??
    • View Profile
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2007, 01:10:00 AM »

Sounds even more easy to transfer gems than the old system.
Logged
I'm back to SL !

sushigewd2.0

  • Guest
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2007, 02:11:15 AM »

not for everyone Shukaku
Logged

Baluski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +172/-135
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3120
    • View Profile
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2007, 02:23:24 AM »

Sounds even more easy to transfer gems than the old system.

I have to agree...although my alt IS in dire need of gems. >=)
Logged
Everytime a thread is locked, a penguin dies.

Obey the moderator!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTLwiccIOxI

Shukaku

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +155/-150
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2788
  • How can my feet smell if they don't have a nose??
    • View Profile
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2007, 02:32:07 AM »

People will just beg and beg for more donation points, even more than the usual, but if it increases the donations, i guess it's good.
Logged
I'm back to SL !

sushigewd2.0

  • Guest
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2007, 02:36:19 AM »

I dont think its a good idea, i dont think gems should be exchanged at all.....
Logged

Shikki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +78/-255
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 29944
  • That's what she said.
    • View Profile
    • 4Spam!
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2007, 02:53:27 AM »

Alt gets a a few dk's and a bunch of dp's from friends/main...
main gets alt to tranfer all gems...
main gets more gems to get stronger....

too easy to abuse :/
Logged

Gyu~ru~ru

  • Site Staff (Moderator)
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Karma: +327/-317
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #7 on: May 12, 2007, 12:38:41 PM »

Never said it was a good idea =p
Logged

Shukaku

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +155/-150
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2788
  • How can my feet smell if they don't have a nose??
    • View Profile
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #8 on: May 12, 2007, 01:46:19 PM »

Not that i don't like the idea xD
Logged
I'm back to SL !

protofusion

  • Guest
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #9 on: May 12, 2007, 02:21:21 PM »

mabye if the price was increased to oh say 1000 points for 20 gems
Logged

Gyu~ru~ru

  • Site Staff (Moderator)
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Karma: +327/-317
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #10 on: May 12, 2007, 04:02:40 PM »

How about if both the sender and recipient have to be at least hokage? Anyone who is caught abusing the function will lose all the gems that were transfered onto him/her.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2007, 04:06:59 PM by Gyu~ru~ru »
Logged

Neji

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +459/-86
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7113
    • View Profile
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #11 on: May 12, 2007, 04:16:23 PM »

I don't know if another "validation" or "check" is necessary....

the gem trade is something I don't want in general.

if people buy gems from others, they should buy it using donation points directly...
Logged
Never judge a cow by its udder.

Twilight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Karma: +3/-7
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 358
    • View Profile
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #12 on: May 12, 2007, 06:53:46 PM »

How about if both the sender and recipient have to be at least hokage? Anyone who is caught abusing the function will lose all the gems that were transfered onto him/her.

At that level I say it would be better to just earn them regularly.. Why both hokage?

I don't know if another "validation" or "check" is necessary....

the gem trade is something I don't want in general.

if people buy gems from others, they should buy it using donation points directly...

Yeah, I agree. I dont think gem trade should be around anymore. You need gems? Just take some time and look around.
Logged
*Needs a new keyboard*

Please excuse my errors in typing when it regards an s or d as they don't show up sometimes..

Shikki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +78/-255
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 29944
  • That's what she said.
    • View Profile
    • 4Spam!
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #13 on: May 12, 2007, 07:05:34 PM »

so thats a no to this feature?
Logged

Neji

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +459/-86
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7113
    • View Profile
Re: Gems transfer through mission HQ
« Reply #14 on: May 12, 2007, 07:14:38 PM »

I would first ask "why do you want to transfer gems".

a) sell them for donation points
b) push up my main
c) to help my friend who gives them back to me
d) to give to somebody that threatens me


which is it?
those who vote for C think *carefully*.

I say about 80% of the people should vote a,b,d.
Logged
Never judge a cow by its udder.
Pages: [1] 2 3
 

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 16 queries.