Gem Bank

Started by Ranketsu Lily, January 06, 2010, 01:46:23 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Ranketsu Lily

January 06, 2010, 01:46:23 AM
I think, personally, that depositing gems should be available in the banks, just as depositing gold is. It would merely be a sub-division of the bank's options, just adding gems to it. Deposit Gems, Withdraw Gems, Withdraw All Gems, Deposit All Gems.

I am sure I, and many others have run into several events where they were knack-sacked and was very upset about losing 1-8 gems, or so. So how about we just deposit our gems with a nifty new feature? The trick to this, naturally, would be that if you don't withdraw your gems before killing Orochimaru you lose 1/3 of them, but just as before you keep all gems on hand if you kill Orochimaru.
9 gems in bank --> Kill Orochimaru --> lose 3 gems
Rough rounding could be anticipated, too, naturally.
55 gems in bank --> Kill Orochimaru --> lose 18 gems

Feedback? Comments? Flaws? Add-ons?

cmage

#1
January 07, 2010, 10:06:37 PM
Let's say I had 500 gems, I wouldn't mind losing 1-7 through events before killing oro rather than running the risk of losing 150+ cause I didn't withdraw them.
Sandaime Mizukage Rakudo
Title: Kage
Gender: Male
Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Born as Master of the Hyuuga Ichizoku
Born as Lee of the Lotus
Born as the Sage of One Path
Orochimaru Kills: 50
master of the exploding donuts and the cattleprod

Ranketsu Lily

#2
January 10, 2010, 09:20:57 PM
It's in the suggestion box for a reason.
Personally I could easily remember gems, and I think it would really benefit people, especially lower ranking people, because they don't get 500+ gems that easily. Four gems is a lot to them, and they probably would hate losing one.

Neji

#3
January 11, 2010, 11:30:28 AM
I am against storing gems in general...

and the chance to lose them when you simply forget withdrawing them is not really good :-/
Never judge a cow by its udder.

cmage

#4
January 15, 2010, 06:29:52 AM Last Edit: January 15, 2010, 06:38:27 AM by cmage
Quote from: Neji on January 11, 2010, 11:30:28 AM
I am against storing gems in general...

and the chance to lose them when you simply forget withdrawing them is not really good :-/
I got an agreement :D
Sandaime Mizukage Rakudo
Title: Kage
Gender: Male
Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Born as Master of the Hyuuga Ichizoku
Born as Lee of the Lotus
Born as the Sage of One Path
Orochimaru Kills: 50
master of the exploding donuts and the cattleprod

Ranketsu Lily

#5
March 06, 2010, 09:22:06 AM
Really?

I guess I understand. Then how about not losing any at all? Because personally I would love to be able to store my gems; ration it out just like I do with gold. Though I don't really use gold. I mean, just to me, this seems quite helpful. That's just me. Or even convenient.

Neji

#6
March 11, 2010, 10:18:42 AM
No.
Never judge a cow by its udder.

SuperSeal

#7
March 11, 2010, 05:44:39 PM
 You tell em Neji!

SuperSeal For President!

ProtoKyuubi

#8
August 16, 2010, 03:47:09 PM
Don't castles allow gem storage anyway?

SuperSeal

#9
August 18, 2010, 05:37:32 PM
no

SuperSeal For President!
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions