I already brought up the whole 'having to leave the village' thing. It doesn't make much sense since, if Rakudo is any example, you can just go and attack the village.
Nathan, the whole point of that was to avoid having the fight in the village itself. Even know, some RP (not a whole lot) is kinked because of what is going on right now in Konoha. Had Rakudo brought a force of Mist ninja, then we'd be talking a full scale war in the village board.
Which technically shouldn't be happening anyways per Neji's rules, but irregardless, a location outside the village would facilitate a zone transfer. Yeah, you can still attack the village if you want to (or even need to) but if people want to hoard the beast at the center of the village at every waking moment, they will have to have them go off on a stroll, even if it is still within sight of the village walls (relatively, abuse will be noted).
◾Jinchūriki have an obligation to roleplay, posting in a public location outside their village of residence at least once every fortnight for the length of a day, even if it's just to visit another village. Those unaffiliated with a village should either post in a village or in the zones.
Why does it makes sense for person to have to leave their village at least once a week in RP? Especially a Kage? I might not leave a village for months on end. It'[s not like we are jet setting about the world. WE have to walk everywhere. Most people do. I am going to cross the desert one a week? It's huge and should take me a week to do.
◾(Pending Approval) If a host is killed while still hosting the tailed beast, then the beast also dies. The challenger, technically then, loses; however, when the beast respawns within a week's time, they are permitted to participate in the fight for the beast. In the meantime, among the challenger and the challenged, a game master must be declared to control the beast itself.
The privilege to do so may be conceded to another party. If a decision has not been made due to a lack of choice availability, then the former host may control the tailed beast. Clear abuse of this will result in an official GM controlling the beast, the choice of which depends on availability and best two out of three for rock-paper-scisssors, with timestamps being used to limit hax.
I feel that at no time should a hopeful for the beast be the one permitted to control it during their own fight to claim it. Meaning, no alts controlling the beast.
Participate in the fight for the free biju was not supposed to imply that one could control the beast in their efforts to control it. Alts would have to fall under abuse; people can and will find a way to get around this stuff, and it would be easier to just consider 'abuse' very broadly.
And while I don't want to cause a fuss, I will plainly state this: If you don't want your Kage having to deal with these issues, then either don't have the Kage host it, or we make a loophole that Kages are exempt. And a fortnight is two weeks if I recall correctly.
There is a question I would like to ask regarding the summoning of a biju (semi off topic with the current conversation but it's been bugging me) What if one does not wish to become a jinchuuriki, but instead decided to summon it through say the usage of Sharingan's Genjutsu, Gedo mazo, sheer "friendliness", etc. How would that work in relation to the new rules of being sealed within a "proper host"? Could one simply have a summoning seal upon them or some realm dedicated to their captured biju and that would count as proper or what?
The main reason that beasts are supposed to be in a host is somewhat carrying over the biju challenge concept of no biju companions. I mean, this can be changed if people really want that storm, but I soundly object to allowing that at this time.
Why? Again, abuse. You have contract, you lose fight, someone else summons beast, now you gotta fight a whole new war. The whole concept would have to be reworked to fit a system that allows that.
Author
Topic: Another Biju Topic: This time, new Rules (Read 21276 times)