Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Ѕhadow]

If people are going to fight each other for a biju, give two set rules to speed it up. Reduce the time between responses from 7 days to 5 or 3. Also give them 2-3 pages on the forum max. Then a judge decided the winner based on how the fight was going, etc. That way you have expedited posting, and also a page limit so the fight doesn't go on forever.

If people would prefer the multiple challengers per Bijuu option, and if it gets implemented, then we will look into ways to expedite the process. There's no reason not to have each Bijuu either sealed or in combat in 3-4 weeks. (6 more days for Eric to vote, Silver if he's around, a week challenge period, then the actual RP.)


It appears that support for Kay's idea is growing, so;

COUNCIL ONLY:
The 0-3, 5-9 Tails will be distributed as follows:
A 1 Week Open challenge period in which case anyone may challenge ONE Bijuu of their choice.
Challengers who challenge for the same Bijuu will fight each other (1v1, tournament style if applicable [rules tbd]) and the winner will be awarded the Bijuu.
Challengers who's Bijuu does not receive another challenge will face the Bijuu (GMs tbd) in 1v1 combat. They must defeat, seal, or otherwise incapacitate the Bijuu to be declared successful and obtain control of the Bijuu.
Bijuu who do not receive a challenge in the one-week time period will be set to roaming. They may be hunted and challenged by any individual, group, village, etc.
Bijuu who's challengers fail to capture them will be set to roaming as per above.

Yay or Nay.


My vote's still Yay.

I want to avoid GMing the beast to a person. IN MY MOST HUMBLE OPINION (Chinote most likely disagrees with me), it feels like we'd giving the beast away on a silver platter if we were to GM it. With a torne, I feel like the beast will be 'earned'. Hence my slight obsession with it. And that's why Kay's idea is so worthy of my vote.

Personally, I think the priority should be to get them back into the public is fast and fair as possible. With the current player base, silver platters are unavoidable.

I like this

[Genesis]

I vote Yay.

I also want to add one more thing. The community will vote on a panel of 5 (I threw out an random number) of judges and participants of this great distribution. Any ruling of these judges will be treated as law or whatever.

OR, the two combatants will agree upon a single judge...the old traditional way.

I'll set up a thread on who wants to go for what beast if this goes through.

Edit: Personally, I prefer the panel of judges because it's such a wide distribution and could be a huge brouhaha.

[Becquerel]

Sorry for posting in here because I'm not a council member, but, just got a quick question that I'm curious about

Question:
Do the challenges need to take place in the forum or can they be done in the zones?

And can NPCs take part?

[Genesis]

Sorry for posting in here because I'm not a council member, but, just got a quick question that I'm curious about

Question:
Do the challenges need to take place in the forum or can they be done in the zones?

And can NPCs take part?

To the first one, I say why not.

To the second one...maybe? I mean, as long as it's one character per beast, I don't see how that breaks the 'rules'. But, the rules haven't been made yet.

[Ѕhadow]

I'll set up a thread on who wants to go for what beast if this goes through.

I....already have a thread for that. >>

[Chinote]

I said the moment this session closes that I would open a thread for official challenges.

Define "take part." Can an NPC challenge for a Bijuu? I'd say no. Can they fight with you in your 1v1s? I'd also say no.

[Genesis]

I'll set up a thread on who wants to go for what beast if this goes through.

I....already have a thread for that. >>

Can you start up a new thread once this goes through? Like we get all the votes from the members. We'll make it super official.

Edit: Or chinny will do it. Someone do it, I don't care.

[Ѕhadow]

http://forum.shinobilegends.com/index.php/topic,9040.0.html

I've talked to those I think are interested in the bijuu.

[Genesis]

http://forum.shinobilegends.com/index.php/topic,9040.0.html

I've talked to those I think are interested in the bijuu.

Chinote, is it cool if we just use this thread? Shadow already has it up.

[Chinote]

I'm going to say no.
Why?
Because we still have a pending vote on whether to honor existing challenges. My vote remains unchanged.
Another reason is that he has himself listed. With the thread locked, we have no way of knowing if he's truly the sole challenger for the 8 Tails, or if he's gaming his own system. We don't even know if that's everyone who's shown interest, or just people he likes. I'm not saying he's cheating, but that the possibility exists.
No, let's have the Council run it once we decide on things. That we we ensure transparency and fairness.

[Teostra]

As someone who is interested, I think it's a good idea to wait until you guys got a lasso around the problem before letting people call dibs. ^_^

[Ѕhadow]

As someone who is interested, I think it's a good idea to wait until you guys got a lasso around the problem before letting people call dibs. ^_^

Which one? >>

[Teostra]

7 or 5 tails. Either or.

[KayentaMoenkopi]

As someone who is interested, I think it's a good idea to wait until you guys got a lasso around the problem before letting people call dibs. ^_^

AMEN TEO!!!

People didn't like the word grace period...how about deliberation?

Additionally: for the bijuu calling dibs thread...I would prefer that a council member creates it, maintains it, and that people make their post/claim to that thread for all to see.

IF

this is what the council is doing with the bijuu. I would say to go with that and forget prior challenges. just make a new one.
let the council come to its decision and THEN proceed as indicated.

[Ѕhadow]

7 or 5 tails. Either or.

7 it is! <3


My thread is purely to show who wants what. Whatever you do with that well....is yet to be seen.