Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Hitler-Chan]

Multiple fights don't work. Also that would directly interfere with trying to do this quickly. This one multi fight would take weeks even if done by the rules.

I hate to be needlessly despondent, but when regarding the Bijuu, nothing tends to move quickly. If all participants agree to a Big Brawl, I do not see any reason, nor do I see any residing power that has the authority to tell them they cannot. Strictly speaking about the battle itself, it would provide large benefits to those who understand the rules of engagement, and would penalize those who don't. Would also give those who believe they are less equipped an easier way to take down an opponent who has been worn down from slaying another participant. Since nobody currently has a bijuu sealed within them, no way to claim enough chakra to fight 2 or 3 'equal' opponents without tiring.

[Trev]

I don't think a giant brawl would be good, as I prefer 1v1 style bracket (Although brackets are problematic if you don't have easy numbers to deal with; 2,4,8,16, etc)

But if everyone in said match agrees, I say they should be allowed to, but all must agree. I'd hate to be the judge for that match though. So many complaints, and god forbid it reach the post limit. It's hard enough for a judge to decide the winner between two people, nevermind more. It also could create an unfair fight, if participants in said brawl decide to team up before facing each other at the end. Someone could potentially be walking into a 3 v 1 right off the bat.

Edit addition. Also for a group fight, other things have to be considered, like the time limit of the fight. If the fights only last 2-3 weeks, and seven days are allowed between post. Well, you may only get like up to 5 posts total before the limit is hit >.>

But that's just me being a pessimistic. If the combatants want it, I say go for it.

[Rusaku]

Ohhhhh yes. Rikudou for the nine tails. Formerly known as Ryoji.

[Hazama]

Ohhhhh yes. Rikudou for the nine tails. Formerly known as Ryoji.

You would

[Rusaku]

Ohhhhh yes. Rikudou for the nine tails. Formerly known as Ryoji.

You would

I mean...just look at the competition. Why wouldn't I want to take candy from babies?

[Hazama]

Ohhhhh yes. Rikudou for the nine tails. Formerly known as Ryoji.

You would

I mean...just look at the competition. Why wouldn't I want to take candy from babies?

Oi, oi. Didn't you father ever tell you that if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all? ;p

[Tsuyo]

I don't think a giant brawl would be good, as I prefer 1v1 style bracket (Although brackets are problematic if you don't have easy numbers to deal with; 2,4,8,16, etc)

But if everyone in said match agrees, I say they should be allowed to, but all must agree. I'd hate to be the judge for that match though. So many complaints, and god forbid it reach the post limit. It's hard enough for a judge to decide the winner between two people, nevermind more. It also could create an unfair fight, if participants in said brawl decide to team up before facing each other at the end. Someone could potentially be walking into a 3 v 1 right off the bat.

Edit addition. Also for a group fight, other things have to be considered, like the time limit of the fight. If the fights only last 2-3 weeks, and seven days are allowed between post. Well, you may only get like up to 5 posts total before the limit is hit >.>

But that's just me being a pessimistic. If the combatants want it, I say go for it.

Maybe some rules should be set for multi-fights for biju brawls if they become a thing. I mean we've been seeing 2v2's so it's not too far of a stretch. Stricter time constraints calls out to me. And truth be told, multi fights may wind up being quick. After all, that's quite a bit of detail to remember, as well as a lot of possible opposition/god killing moves to work against with just the three move limit. But hell, like you said, a possible 3v1 could happen, or a 2v1. That seems like it could be a lil' scurrrry. BACK YOU FIENDS! 

My preference is a 1v1, but i'm down if everyone else is...Just a little off topic.

[UettoSenju]

I'm down for a free for all of the others are. I don't care really.

[Genesis]

So something just occurred in the nine tails bracket. There are five people now. In the case the free for all doesn't occur or a sixth doesn't apply, how do we determine who gets a bye?

That's an open question to all of you.

[Ѕhadow]

So something just occurred in the nine tails bracket. There are five people now. In the case the free for all doesn't occur or a sixth doesn't apply, how do we determine who gets a bye?

That's an open question to all of you.

Draw straws or a randomizer?

[Nathan]

Might drop out if that's the case. Don't wanna do a free for all because it's a cluster-fudge.

[Genesis]

Might drop out if that's the case. Don't wanna do a free for all because it's a cluster-fudge.

That would be unfortunate. ^{lmao no balls}

[Nathan]

Might drop out if that's the case. Don't wanna do a free for all because it's a cluster-fudge.

That would be unfortunate. ^{lmao no balls}

Well, I just got word from my job. I won't be working for the next few weeks, so now I have plenty of time if a free-for-all was to go down. Was rather sudden of them, but I ain't complaining.

[Rusaku]

I'm down for a game of BR.

[Trev]

So something just occurred in the nine tails bracket. There are five people now. In the case the free for all doesn't occur or a sixth doesn't apply, how do we determine who gets a bye?

That's an open question to all of you.

One of the many problems. Use a randomizer to give someone a bye, or make one match a triple threat. It's not gonna be fair unless its break to an easy number 2,4,8,16, etc