421
Bijuu Arena / Re: Refusing a Bijuu Challenge and respawning
« on: January 07, 2015, 01:53:32 AM »It is my assertion the bijuu should be stripped from Dart for refusal to accept a challenge.
Since Kotetsu was made to accept Yuijo's challenge, even though he was harassing him quite scathingly during his grace period, I feel that this is a president for having to put up with people who annoy you if you are a host. In the end as he was unwilling to put up with the harassment, he had to give the bijuu away.
this should also be Dart's fate because fair is fair.
If you cannot deal with the drama then you should not have the perk.
I cannot be stripped since I am actually following through with all my duties, i.e. remaining active, setting up the next challenge after Sabu's disappearances. As it is, with the proceedings as they are, the "law" in which you're trying to impose is ex post facto, and I'm immune to it.
Now if another challenge would be issued, I *still* fall under the three strikes rule meaning I have two more opportunities to nullify it her challenge, if I so desired.
I'll fix the problem. I'll challenge Dart and then get the bijuu and then give it to Bocc and then from there we go.
Oh please make this a reality, that will just lengthen the list. Plus, the latter option seems to where I'm leaning at right now.
Giving it to him would be the WORST idea
Now I'm tempted even further to just "give it to him" to spite you.
I'll fix the problem. I'll challenge Dart and then get the bijuu and then give it to Bocc and then from there we go.
I agree, I'm running out of alts to give them to and I dont need all 9 till we get the Gedo Mazo, anyway. You'd be in line behind Hazama, Kamui, and Ichirou. I would be surprised, pleasantly for reference, if Dart beat all 3 of them. So that's probably not needed.
Like I said I did not care which way this went, it seems to be leaning towards you have to accept fights from all comers, so I'm going to side with the majority then and say you have to accept challenges from everyone or forfeit the bijuu. That being said if Ryu was serious about challenging me let me know.
If the Jinchueriki is killed IC the beast respawns around that area a week later, under the control of a GM, was how I thought that worked. If the host dies in a fight the bijuu goes to the winner unless they for some reason agreed to an IC fight where you cannot kill the host to get the beast.
Well, if my own [self-proclaimed*] arch nemesis [and current under fire] is agreeing with the rest, fine. I'll accept her challenge AND if she cannot conduct herself with respect and begins to insult and harass me at any moment, ALL encounters with her will be permanently null, voided, and ignored.
*Self-proclaimed because we don't actually have any IC reason to be enemies other than him being a wanted missing-nin from my village.
Also, the beast respawns after its jinchūriki is killed IC one week later under the control of a non-biased GM, that's been the standard the entire time. Now, I like the idea of the previous judge being the own in control. Helps maintain that air of consistency.