Again with the ruining site bull. Seriously? People like us, that you often state as rigid, having a stick up their posterior and other offensive means of reference, make it a better place if nothing else. I, myself, have opened the eyes of quite a few demons, werewolves, fairies, etc. and set them straight as well as elaborating to many that god moded mostly out of lack of knowledge or cause no one explained it in detail to them. So yeah, going by your brilliant ideology, I have no right, blah, blah, blah. That doesn't hurt the site. It's the other way around, people that rp in a certain manner, then snap at those like us for "belittling" their overly "creative" natures, while full knowing many gravely disagree with their means and are being a big sore eyes for quite a few are the ones ruining the site, as are those that throw a fit whenever they don't get their way and claim their way anyway no matter what others say(not giving names >>). Pretty much we're praised by those that rp properly as shinobi on SHINOBI legends and those we changed the ways of, them of course being glad the ridiculing of many has stopped raining on them.
As for the council, that is obviously why it is being rewritten. The base it had was obviously an incorrect one given that untrusted people in regards to rp evaluation and what not were in it. As I said, perfect world, that kage and bijuu would be all fine and dandy, but it's not. Whenever I bring the lesser part of your supposed council to those knowing of the ones in question I get "never acknowledged it" "lol U kiddin right" etc. But according to you, council members that make people lol are much more qualified than me, who has been treated as such by the community for quite some time now. That's some nice logic you have. To sum it up, that method is bad cause it doesn't really verify competence in the slightest and it give birth to way more council members than needed. If it come to kage, I have more first hand experience than most in such, I've been like one w/o the title along side the last hokages, even w/o them on multiple occasions. So just cause I choose to not be some power/pride hungry dude and work just like one w/o taking the title doesn't make me anything less. First hand experience and knowledge? It's not like Jinchuriki fights abide by entirely different rules than rp, in fact I aided in many of those upon requests of one or both parties cause Rai and Zen were not on, and they've apparently saw me as the next best thing. As for when it come to rp, my insight in regards to errors and noruto knowledge, surpasses many, that's pretty much the experience and knowledge that should be taken in consideration rather than Rakudo trolling by giving a weakling a bijuu that gets taken by the first challenger, a one year ago Boc or so and suddenly that weakling, that on the most part is ridiculed for his fail when it comes to rp is suddenly eligible for a council seat. Not gods but at least people renown for their ability in a non bashful form, or at least not renown bashfully. If even that doesn't make sense, then yeah, Kayenta is pretty much right.
Well, there are the select few that view rules enforcement badly but that's no different than a bunch of hippies going: Duuuuuuuuuuuude, the government and laws are ruining this country.
The beliefs of Asadi and Kay in means of creativity is that we should let people do and be w/e they want. Yeah, I'm not the only one seeing something bad with that.
Let's get down to getting some head lines.
I didn't yet get a clear response on weather we are putting the pirated kg specified in the rules. Boc said it ain't in the rules and what not, questioned me greatly, and said if it's the way it is, the rules should be more specific about it. I agree with that, it would help us avoid arguments like these taking place in the future.
What of Custom kg, do we agree that it should be there also with the exception of sitters? They should only get one in my view, with no exaggerations. We also need to define the sitter level required. How about pvp extent set to a minimum of 80 for obvious reasons? The point I am trying to make is that this stuff needs to be better specified and the rules should be less ambiguous.