As a continuation from
here, I've taken it upon myself to list off the highlights from the prior thread and what changes we are looking to make. Because of Kayenta's
leave, her
thread is no longer subject to editing at our will to keep up-to-date with our progress.
Although open to discussion, I strongly plea we keep any sort of bashing, etc. to ourselves or, even, to PM's -- but away from this thread. I urge you to take upon yourself a lax tone, respectful attitude, and a positive-reinforcement mindset. Any initiation of negative attitudes, etc., etc. will be reported for removal.
To begin, I will list the current rules as well as what we aim to change or add.
ºHow to Challenge a Jinchūrikiº
In order to challenge a Jinchūriki & obtain a Bijū, one must extend an invitation to its host along with proper arrangements for it to take place; should the Jinchūriki refuse the set date/time: negotiate for a more appropriate time. Should the Jinchūriki ignore or refuse the invitation(s)-with no reason given- 3 times consecutively, you may report it to other Jinchūriki. Subject for such an event's invitation, for proof & reference of a challenge, must be titled: (Number of tails) - (Name of Jinchūriki); the body of the message may be as you please (though manners & politeness would of course make things much smoother).
ºShould the Bijū be Host-lessº
Should the Bijū be sealed within something not a Jinchūriki, whomsoever is in possession of the tailed beast (for a prolonged period of one week or more) is entitled to assume duties of fighting for possession of the Bijū. As such: Bijū are not to be set free to roam; they must be sealed and delivered to the village of their last Jinchūriki.
ºHow to declare a winnerº
The battle commences with the initial post & terminates once either combatant is unable to continue. Such a feat can result in several ways, including knock-outs (concussions, etc.), full paralysis, almost-fatal wounds & so forth. So long both parties declare it plausible & understand the longevity/risk of the claim, it's considered eligible for use. However, things can, of course, become debatable in attempt to reach such a goal & in doing so arguments are bound to commence. If need be, either party can have onlookers & such /dis/agree with the action until a verdict is reached. If desired, either party can have other hosts or officials of sorts represent them for a more "legitimized" (as some have called it) reasoning or "Back-up".
ºRulesº
Like any other zone fight, rules are established as support for completing the quarrel without need for troubles to arise. Those basic rules are also adopted into host-challenges. The rules are as follows [unless agreed upon both parties (with proof) to be something otherwise]:
‾No Auto-Hitting.
Auto-Hitting is recognized as being a direct action following through without consent of the opposing party.
‾No God-Modding.
God-Modding has been recognized as an incorrect claim of one or more super-powers incapable of one's possession or against what one's character establishes. Several other things have been regarded God-Modding such as dodging every attack, extreme maneuvers & such. If God-Modding should occur, the opposing party will object to it & things can be negotiated from there.
‾Hosts are allowed to use their tails.
There should be no arguments about a host using their Bijū's abilities. However, the claim of utilizing all of their tails, if it seems unfit for them, due to period of time with the Biju, can be negotiable [but must be maintained brief]. Furthermore, other rules can be negotiated between both parties. I.E. Rules such as the number of contestants versus the host [? v. the host (1)] can also be negotiated, etc.
ºGrace Periodº
After any challenge (& loss) from a challenger, a week must be given to the host before challenging them to a rematch (the one week grace period is in subject to a single challenger & as such does not signify a host can ignore challenges from all others during the time period). In cases such as obtaining a Bijū for oneself, a 2-week grace period is granted In order to “commune” with one’s Bijū. If a host shows inactivity for long periods of time (two weeks or more) without prior notice, you can report their missing & conference of a suitable host will take place when possible.
ºTampering with the Bijūº
Tampering with the Bijū, meaning: destroying it, editing its affinity, parting its powers into multiple entities, etc. & anything that changes it from its known canon form is prohibited. Reason being the unpredictable results of its edit & inability to properly decide what lies correct or not.
To be added, revised, or debated:
1) Fleeing from fights is not allowed.
- Adding
2) Time-frame of tail achieving.
- Adding
3) Use of custom Kekkei Genkai
- Debating
- Adding limits to validity of claim
4) Battles for Bijuu are permanent(!) in outcome. That is to say: what happens in the bijuu fight is not OOC, it influences characters; loss of limbs, etc.
- Debating
5) Jinchuuriki initiating a fight against other jinchuuriki for claim of their tailed beast
- Debating
6) ...
Secondly, suggested council persons.
1) Raifudo
2) Zenaku
3) Rakudo
4) Rares
5) Nathan
6) Tommi
7) ...
These names are subject to change and the list quantity is as well.Currently in debate for council:
A) Should Kages, past and present, hold sudden rights to be part of the council?
b) Should Jinchuuriki, past and present, hold sudden rights to be part of the council?
C) Should there be a primary council, which are (insert number here) elected and the sub council which is made up of Kage, Jinchuuriki, etc. and given as a right to them?
- One can argue "why not just give them the power already if you're making a sub-council?"; yes, we can do that, however the primary is held as a "governing" body while the subordinate council offers advice, etc.
- - The idea is diminishing the more I think on it.
D) Amount of people in council and how council members are edited.
Thirdly, the solution to inactive jinchuuriki.
Because the rule of bijuu being host-less (refer to above rule of being host-less), in this sense that the jinchuuriki be inactive for an extended period of time (refer to above rule for grace periods), we have shown lenience towards villages, whose inactive shinobi is in possession of the bijuu, receiving the bijuu for electing a new host.
A) As such, the Four-Tailed beast -- previously in the hands of Darkshinobi -- is now in possession of
Nathan.
B) As such, the Three-Tailed Beast -- previously in the hands of Ranketsu -- is now in possession of Rakudo.
- Possible exchange of the bijuu,
the three tailed for the five tailed, is being discussed between Rakudo and Zenaku.
- - Similarly, the same is to be done for the
two tailed and the six tailed.
5/3/12: Thread Started.
5/3/12: Added "D)" to discussion of council.
5/3/12: Edited "A)" of bijuu-fight rules to "debating" from "adding".
Poll
6 (27.3%)
Author
Topic: Rewriting the Bijuu rules, The council, and Jinchuuriki Elections. (Read 77839 times)